Anti-recoil macros

[Subtle Bull]

A cheat that many people overlook because it is so widespread is the anti-recoil macro. When you watch death cams, you can notice this zig-zag or Z pattern with the cursor moving up and down very quickly in a small area. What amazes me is that this is not detected even though this pattern is mathematically perfect. It’s insane how many people use this. It’s very easy to obtain, including with AHK or the built-in macro functions in the mouse. Mouse manufacturers are partly responsible for the proliferation of cheating through this feature. What were they thinking when they introduced this?

My question is: when will Krafton take action against this cheat? Because yes, if an external software gives you an advantage over other players, it’s a cheat.

PS: The report menu has an option for “no recoil”, not for “low recoil”. It’s not the same thing at all.

[femboy cumstain]

引用自 iXeN：

引用自 SlashX：

pubg just selling cheats to people who stream the game like it was in 2018. Never change the recipe.

Because recoil pattern is wild, as if I'm fighting for my life. I can only hit at close range 1v1 and most the times I'm the one who dies.

the first 14 bullets are not random and follow a set pattern. This is the reason high-skill (usually pro) players stop firing half-way through a magazine and start firing again. Once you reach the halfway mark in a magazine, bullet spread becomes random. So, as long as a player doesn't spray a whole magazine, it's actually very easy to control the recoil.

Hopefully this info helps you win some future battles.

Also, stand still, preferably crouching when firing. If you're standing you take an accuracy penalty, and you take a major accuracy penalty if you're moving, even if you're crouched while moving. Briefly stop moving to fire, and then move again.

[FORNAKS]

引用自 Lega：

No, I don't know how common no-recoil cheats are but nobody else knows it either, they just think they know it, often based on the wrong argument, replay/death cam = no recoil.

Video evidence won't be used in this case but the report still matters, just not the 1 minute of it. It was obvious already but somehow, even proven facts won't be used.

If PUBG checks the recoil, they use the data of the recoil server-side or starts player based scans.

Nobody said it's impossible to detect, just very difficult. Everything else got added based on prejudiced and how many use it, wasn't even part of this talk.

Free, cheap, hart to detect are just a few points of many and even if it would be 100% free and save to use, I wouldn't touch it, would you? I don't think so.

What does it mean in terms of, how many use it?

It may be a good choice for cheaters who don't care about their own skill at all but that's it.
Many use wall-hack only because they can control the guns etc, and it would be boring to play with aim-bots, or other helps like that, including no-recoil.

Wall-hack is still the most used hack I meet.

we are used to you constantly denying and changing what you write. now macros have become an aim bot. i believe i saw your wrongly given place.




now we are again facing disconnections and crashes during combat. the game is already broken. it is no longer surprising that this is happening. we are in a similar situation as in the video.

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZM6ydpmwQ/

[Lega]

"aim-bots and other helps Like no-recoil"

Other helps aren't aim-bots but thanks for proving the point, I don't do what many claim.

[AughtNisNaughtNoughtBēonAught]

引用自 Shady Knights：

https://www.tiktok.com/@pubgmacro2024/video/7338680524644371719

So why wouldn't this be common?


Cheat denier viewpoints:

1. It's not common because it reduces the skill level for cheaters and it would make the game more boring for them.

2. It's not common because they can't see it in their replays, despite also admitting that the replay is flawed and doesn't show it.

3. PUBG ban more for wallhacking, wall hacking is the most common cheat.

4. They wouldn't touch it, other legit players wouldn't touch it, so how could it be common with cheaters?


Realist viewpoints:

1. Lua scripts are cheap and/or free. They can also be edited/modified easily.

2. Reports on "no recoil" are ignored because PUBG do not keep evidence of this cheat in their replay files so can never ban anybody for them.

3. PUBG have never had a way to effectively detect and enforce no recoil bans since launch. Cheating bans are only for either aimbot, teaming, ESP, or walking through objects and flying cars.

4. They work and clearly provide an advantage to low skilled players.

5. PUBG has a proven track record of being infested with cheating. Over 30 million accounts banned since launch, with over a million banned already this year alone. Is it really a stretch to think there's many cheaters that would use a cheap/free, undetectable cheat that PUBG never ban you for?

The forcible suppression of the commonality of pubg cheating protests is a defense mechanism to protect revenue via deceptive astroturfing (Steam Troll Farm Unknown's).

Astroturfing is advertising by creating a false impression of grassroots support ignoring the guides concerning the use of endorsements and testimonials in word-of-mouth marketing.

FTC's guides holds advertisers responsible for ensuring bloggers or product endorsers comply with the guides, and any product endorsers with a material connection are required to provide honest reviews. In 2018, Entergy was fined five million dollars for using astroturf firm The Hawthorn Group to provide actors to prevent real community members' voices from being counted at city council meetings and show false grassroots support.

Commercialized accounts (fake alternate marketing accounts, deleting posts to hide their post counts or shared accounts with post counts exceeding 27,000 entries) are advertising to create uncertainty and lower trust about cheating claims, thereby changing perceptions that favor the business interests behind the astroturfing effort.

Commercial content is not permitted here.

Discussions are not a place for commercial activity. An example of commercial content includes astroturfing.

Not a good look for Steam/Valve.

[Dragosani]

引用自 AughtNisNaughtNoughtBēonAught：

引用自 Shady Knights：

https://www.tiktok.com/@pubgmacro2024/video/7338680524644371719

So why wouldn't this be common?


Cheat denier viewpoints:

1. It's not common because it reduces the skill level for cheaters and it would make the game more boring for them.

2. It's not common because they can't see it in their replays, despite also admitting that the replay is flawed and doesn't show it.

3. PUBG ban more for wallhacking, wall hacking is the most common cheat.

4. They wouldn't touch it, other legit players wouldn't touch it, so how could it be common with cheaters?


Realist viewpoints:

1. Lua scripts are cheap and/or free. They can also be edited/modified easily.

2. Reports on "no recoil" are ignored because PUBG do not keep evidence of this cheat in their replay files so can never ban anybody for them.

3. PUBG have never had a way to effectively detect and enforce no recoil bans since launch. Cheating bans are only for either aimbot, teaming, ESP, or walking through objects and flying cars.

4. They work and clearly provide an advantage to low skilled players.

5. PUBG has a proven track record of being infested with cheating. Over 30 million accounts banned since launch, with over a million banned already this year alone. Is it really a stretch to think there's many cheaters that would use a cheap/free, undetectable cheat that PUBG never ban you for?

The forcible suppression of the commonality of pubg cheating protests is a defense mechanism to protect revenue via deceptive astroturfing (Steam Troll Farm Unknown's).

Astroturfing is advertising by creating a false impression of grassroots support ignoring the guides concerning the use of endorsements and testimonials in word-of-mouth marketing.

FTC's guides holds advertisers responsible for ensuring bloggers or product endorsers comply with the guides, and any product endorsers with a material connection are required to provide honest reviews. In 2018, Entergy was fined five million dollars for using astroturf firm The Hawthorn Group to provide actors to prevent real community members' voices from being counted at city council meetings and show false grassroots support.

Commercialized accounts (fake alternate marketing accounts, deleting posts to hide their post counts or shared accounts with post counts exceeding 27,000 entries) are advertising to create uncertainty and lower trust about cheating claims, thereby changing perceptions that favor the business interests behind the astroturfing effort.

Commercial content is not permitted here.

Discussions are not a place for commercial activity. An example of commercial content includes astroturfing.

Not a good look for Steam/Valve.

It's totally Kremlin-esque propaganda as they have been using these methods since the beginning of the century and still do to this day.....It's weak, cowardice and a real issue that begins to distort the actual truth of what should happen in the civilised world.....