Why is causal limited to 3 matches per day

[Igris]

Just remove it honestly.

[Sir Diesel]

It's too fun, I think they should remove TPP so new players can transition to real game play easier.

[nova]

exactly, the limit is dumb. it should also help with queue time as only 12 players required to start a match. they should also remove the dumb 10 training ai matches while at it.

[ZEFIR001]

Is that everything what you think is important?

[Decidedly Uncouth]

I only do casual, so, my limit is three. Which, is good, since I would play more PUBG, which I don't honestly need to.

[Mind The Gap]

Originally posted by Casey:

Just remove it honestly.

Remove it +1

[B R O K E M O N O]

Originally posted by Casey:

Just remove it honestly.

They will once it dies down one day in a desperate attempt to gain some players back...

[Tormented]

Originally posted by Sir Diesel:

It's too fun, I think they should remove TPP so new players can transition to real game play easier.

If someone picks tpp means they prefer tpp, if someone choose fpp means they prefer fpp, why asking such dumb things when players can simply choose the way they want to play?

[De$LoC]

Originally posted by Sir Diesel:

It's too fun, I think they should remove TPP so new players can transition to real game play easier.

How about 3 casuals a day in TPP and 3 in FPP.

Also I think they should increase the amount of real players from 12 to 16 per 100.

[Shady Knights]

Casual is perfect for quickly grinding through season pass missions.

[33333333]

they limit it to 3 per day because of two things

1. it would split the queue
2. casual wins actually count

[Nocturne]

Originally posted by Stranger:

Originally posted by Sir Diesel:

It's too fun, I think they should remove TPP so new players can transition to real game play easier.

If someone picks tpp means they prefer tpp, if someone choose fpp means they prefer fpp, why asking such dumb things when players can simply choose the way they want to play?

Drop this pretending. *Everyone* knows that LARGE portion of tpp players "prefer" it because of unfair and uncompetitive peak advantage. In FPP, one can rat only in toilet, but in TPP - one can rat anywhere, basically behind any corner/obstacle. Sadly for you - no secret in that, it takes only to open Twitch to see how tpp players "play" :]

So yeah, if you don't *prefer* fair play - just don't play the game. There are already game for "tpp and skins" - Fortnite. Already a game for built-in cheats for which you not only not be judged - casuals will be even defending you (COD). Why going to most-balanced[in the past, by now...-_-] regarding "realism" game and trying to ruin it? It's not 2000 where there are no choice of what to play - options are endless. And Pubg had great idea/"realism" balance among all other competitors[emerged later as a *copy* of Pubg].

And by same your logic: "people playing with cheats means that they just 'prefer' playing with cheats".

P.S. For a most part of gaming industry there was NO switching between fpp and tpp and it was fine. It was just differnt type of game(FPS needed FPP, of course, while more "adventure-oriented" [half-]shooters could've use TPP for better immersion with main hero. No such things like "tpp CS" or "fpp Tomb Raider", that's just bullsh1t.
Tho I bet you'll never understand that(and that you already forgot "preferring cheating" part by now)

[Clement]

We're locking this thread as it has devolved into non-productive argument. Thanks for your understanding.