Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
But i would prefer to get Linux import :)
We can dream, a FAQ wont stop me.
There's one thing I find a little strange...
According to a summary of one of their dev streams[gamingcrisis.com]:
I wonder how they know there isn't enough interest to justify development. They didn't ask if I was interested and I haven't found an official poll. They've also locked the three most popular Linux/Mac threads, one of them with 473 comments, more than any of the 2,479 active topics in the 'General Discussions' and 'Suggestions & Feedback' subforums (yes, I looked through all the pages).
PUBG already uses UE4, which supposedly eases the pain of developing for multiple platforms. Two of the games I regularly play, ARK and Tower Unite, both use UE4 and support Linux. As far as I gather, Tower Unite's Linux support was implemented entirely by one of their developers independent of their roadmap[trello.com]. It took him about 20 days from the time he started to the public beta. It's a bit buggy and only available in a beta branch on Steam, but still very playable and has me satisfied until they get around to optimizing it for an official release. If PUBG does something similar, I will buy, if none of my friends are desperate enough to gift it to me by then.
Let's say it takes 60 days for one developer with a $100k salary to make and release the Linux client. That's approximately $17,000 worth of time. At $30 per sale with Valve taking a 30% cut, it would take around 800 sales to Linux gamers to break even. According to the Steam survey (which has debatable accuracy, I haven't gotten the survey in several months), Linux is at 0.72%, which would be over 90,000 of the nearly 13 million Steam users currently online as I write this. There are about 241,000 users currently playing PUBG, which if that 0.72% were to carry over, would be about 1,700 potential users playing PUBG on Linux at this moment if the support existed. The numbers would certainly be much higher if you include everyone who owns the game.
If Bluehole still believes that's not enough to justify supporting Linux, I would like to know where exactly they draw the line, or in other words, what would convince them to support it.
People avoid GNU/Linux because of its lack of quality multimedia applications, which is because there's a lack of market, which is because people avoid GNU/Linux, which is because of its lack of quality multimedia applications.