Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
This games not for you Bro ...K thankx Bye .
But once again you go back to saying that the rule is being abused yet we have not seen it actually abused at all yet.
Streamers crying about every time they die being because of a stream sniper does not equal every person that kills a stream sniper getting banned. I'm sure there are plenty of streamers that wish they could abuse the rule and get plenty more people banned, but we're lucky that Bluehole are the ones who decide who gets banned and so far we have no evidence that they are banning people who are innocent.
If that changes and they start abusing the rule and banning people just for interacting with a streamer then i will join you in decrying Blueholes decision. But at this time you are taking a stance against something that has yet to happen and by all accounts doesn't seem likely to happen.
I would believe you were fighting for all gamers if innocent people were getting banned just because of random unintentional interactions with streamers and i would be on your side then. But since that's not the case then to me you seem to only be fighting against streamers, not wanting them to have the same rules protected freedom from being cheated against and harassed.
And if i come accross as some lover of streamers then it is only in poor choice of wording, there are many issues with some streamers who do feel like they should get better treatment than other players. But those are the ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ you find in every group and unfortunately no matter how much of a ♥♥♥♥ they could be they should still have the same rules protecting them as everyone else.
Should you be banned for stream sniping?
Is stream sniping cheating?
Is stream honking harassment?
But this discussion started with the simple question of whether they ban just for killing or honking near a streamer.
So for THIS discussion, everything else is a side discussion. Doesn't diminish their importance or need to be discussed in the overall stream sniper debate but a simple question should have a simple answer. In this case no. Then in other discussions the side discussions here may be the main discussion or you may need to fully discuss two or more of the issues.
If the evidence comes out that Bluehole starts banning random innocent people, or that they secretly have already, for honking their horns near streamers they weren't harassing then i will do a full 180 and agree that they made terrible mistakes and that it should be fixed.
But i don't like decrying a developer for what could happen, there's far too many things that could happen. There's stuff that i think is unlikely to happen but would make me want to instantly stop playing like adding P2W crates that give weapons at the start of the match. This i'm sure some people think is just as likely as you do thinking innocent players will be banned. But in both cases i want it to actually happen before i get mad over it.
Actually loot boxes and in game items ect are saving the gaming industry, if it wasn't for it launch prices on a new AAA game would be £100+, and I like the way loot is changing DLC, many now are doing free DLC, maps guns ect and getting the extra of skins ect which you will only buy if your in to the game.
And a nice alternative to a monthly/yearly subscription cost to keep servers up.. plus.. like in my case, leads to profits paying multiples over the initial investment.
I am concerned about the 'gambling' aspect of things, and how now RNG crate gambling purchases seem to have fallen into a market aimed at minors, but that's a whole different subject. So far I have made over $800 from clothes on the PUBG market after around 350 hours of play. It's well been worth the initial investment in my case. I know several others who sell their crates and clothes and have now either gotten the game for free or made money off of playing it.
I guess one man's "Pervasive cancer garbage" if they can't refrain themselves (hint: don't go shopping) is another man's treasure. A game like this could probably get by with a $5 monthly or $40 annual subscription fee on release, but instead of having to pay you can simply NOT purchase items.. seems like a good deal to me.. but like the greatest offense known to man to plenty of others.
[Citation needed]. I don't doubt that it's likely the case, but this only explains payed DLC content, not paid gambling a la loot boxes. The latter has more in common with the cruddy nickel-and-diming practices used by games (particularly mobile games) like in game currency. In fact, the 'keys' literally are just another form of 'in game currency'- except you can't actually choose what you want with them.
See, this is a dcecent post actually defending the practice. Something I've been waiting for for 8 pages. It's informative (I didn't know you could make money playing the game), and acknowledges some of the more serious concerns (essentially marketing gambling to children) even though you're still clear about your position.
Which makes it all the more puzzling that your posts immediately prior to this are a mixture histrionic, salty whining about strawmen; accusing others of trolling simply because you don't like the question asked; and weirdly stroked out lame troll posts of your own.
So for what it's worth, thanks for that post. It actually helps me make my decision.
your complaining over somthing that hasnt happend or wont at all, unless you going to stream snipe or harrass then you have nothing to worry about.
$30 is nothing and your thread is nothing as well, follow rules and you/others wont get banned.
Some of us pay our own bills, and $30 isn't 'nothing'.
i work and pay a ton of bills, i still have pocket change to throw around, yes $30 is nothing.
As a parent of two children, getting in to gaming and so on, I don't view this as a concern, but then I'm one of them strange parents who watch and guide their children as they grow, a parent actually parenting seem's to be a dying breed these days.
Quite good ones, because I invest my money wisely. That applies to small purchases and big purchases. A powerful PC is something I need for a variety of reasons. Same with internet speed. Another shooter game is not essential. Remember, a product or service is only worth as much as the money you're willing to shell out for it- not the other way around.
And yet I'm pretty sure you'd have a problem with alcohol and cigarette companies marketing equally addictive practices to children, regardless of how active a role you play in your child's upbringing.