Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It's undetectable until it is...
There is always a front line and anticheat must continually catch up.
If you're worrying about that hacks are ahead of anticheat, that's the eternal struggle.
The real issue arises from when hacker sub-population is significant within the total population.
No serious issue for now. let them keep feeding the coffers with successive ban waves.
Edit:
the biggest tragedy is that hacks actually push the price of these types of games up to discourage multiple accounts due to banhammers :(
Also the claim of "it being an eternal struggle" is laughable. Battle-eye has always been miles behind the cheating community and will continue to be that way until Game Companies/Developers stop entrusting the security of their online community to them. My friend with Cheat Engine can bypass Battleye and has been doing so since Arma 2.
So battleye is so good that some college kid with a free program can bypass them undetected?
I feel you mistook the underlying message. Whether there has been only one or many 'ban-waves', every hacker killed off is another opportunity of sales for the devs, and a victory for the legitimate players.
Mate, i'm not defending battle eye, but you gotta understand that anti-cheat, the same as flu-vaccines; anti-piracy and DRM, is a REACTIVE not PROACTIVE defensive strategy, despite it being a PREVENTATIVE measure (caps for emphasis, please dont interpret as patronising). AP is significantly proactive i'll give up, but a good DRM (lol) will only be pro-active up until the first contact with attempts to breach it.
If battle-eye is a poor product, then so be it. I've had this game for a week or so and have not experienced any problems, even end up in top10 more times than not. That said, my perspective is biased due to this fact, perhaps more than yours. But being a long-time FPS/MP-gaming enthusiast, i can say with a degree of authority that hackers are always present, and no matter the product, the anti-cheat by definition is forced to react to the threat and will rarely if ever be able to pre-empt it.
it's homeostasis 101 bro.
If the game is so young, then just give it time to mature. The devs can only operate as fast as a human can, between brainstorming, coding and testing, i'm sure that considering hte most appropriate anti-cheat software is only yet another burdeon on their total capacity.