Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
2.5k/d isnt low lol, its quite high. DrDisrespect doesnt even have 2.5
As far as the overall average goes its definitely way below 1k/d.
no you dont, the only season you played more than 30 games you had below 1. Dont BS.
of course you play whatever way you enjoy the game. Just saying a lot of people BS about their KD and there's a way to check them. I guess they arent aware. Pretty much everyone in here saying I have 4kd and avergae is over 2kd after 100h, is extremely full of sht.
maybe, but I checked most of those claming great KD in here, all the way back to late 2017, and none have a KD even close to what they claim. I'm just pointing out the bs, there's ways to check.
Some claiming over 2.5, and saying 2.5 and 3 is low, while they barely have 1 KD if that.
The player count has gone down. My theory is that more of the players who were good or got good stayed and those who never could left. My matches are much harder compared to the first seasons. Back then i met players till the top 10 who couldnt hit a damn shot. Now i rarely see a player who cant aim in the top 30. I'm happy the average player is better as wins feel more worth it now.
Anyway so in conclusion. Most pubg players sucked back then, less so now. A "decent" kd was higher back then because of how bad the average player was.
The math in this thread is all messed up. A quick counter example for all of you: If we play three 1v1 games and I win twice and you once, my K/D ratio is 2/1 = 2 and yours is 1/2 = 0.5, the average of which is 1.25 and NOT 1.0. The fact that, excluding suicides and the likes, the total number of kills equals the total number of deaths doesn't tell you anything about the average of the individual players' K/D ratios, which is what this thread is about. More exactly: It's not hard to find extreme examples where the K/D ratio can be arbitrarily high (a million 1v1s where I win all but one) but it's also easy to show that the K/D ratio cannot be smaller than 1-1/(number of players), which is nearly 1.
That said, it might be actually be that most players have a K/D ratio smaller than 1.0 because they get dominated by a few very strong players. That means that if you exclude suicides and so on and your K/D ratio is 0.5 you are quite far below average - but it might just be that so are most of the players. I would also still suspect an average K/D ratio - again, excluding suicides and so on - only slightly above 1.0 since there are probably far more mediocre occasional players than there are very good players.
My personal k/d ratio is around 0.6 because I suck at this game.
Correct numbers are hard to find but the most people can reach 1 kill each round.
Not at start but while playing and getting better.
FPP is much harder than TPP, and also the game got much harder. it was easier to get a 5KD last year than it is to get 1kd now.