安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
i wouldnt put scaling all the way up cause even on lower setting its going to take a lot of performance to do scaling at max unless you have a beast PC like 1080gtx or some kind of SLI setup. BUT even then we have to remember this is an early access game that is still very much being optimized. so you cant expect realistic performance when trying to max settings like that. screen scale to max would be like the game rendering at 4k res and then downscale to your res.
i have a 780gtx 6gb card but with an older i7 2600k at stock speeds. I run the scaling at default since they did some optimizations. Before the optimization i lowered it to arund 90 or 95 to give extra frames and keep other setting at normal.
i dont think its realistic to try and max scaling or ultra high setting till they do more optimizations. right now we just have to find the balance for performance and looks that we each like.
Lowering scale should give a significant FPS boost, at the cost of making the game look terrible. I don't know how well it's implemented here though.
Nonsense,do not listin to this guy not only is it unture you will also get a swift ban.
100 percent false editng the game gameusersettings.ini will in fact NOT get you banned do to those are the settings that just effect graphics controls etc...