PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS

PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS

View Stats:
Felky Mar 23, 2017 @ 1:38pm
Why no 3 man team mode?
I only have 2 friends, we don't want to play squad mode..

It was the same thing in For Honor, why do devs hate people who only want to play 3-players games? :sadpanda:
< >
Showing 1-15 of 37 comments
Septic Mar 23, 2017 @ 1:42pm 
But there is
FunkThatBishop Mar 23, 2017 @ 1:43pm 
What about people of 4, or 6 or 12. No, Dous and fives work the best. Quit complaining or just get more friends.
Felky Mar 23, 2017 @ 1:43pm 
Nah, it's only Solo, Duo, Squad.
Flopple Mar 23, 2017 @ 1:44pm 
Squads is completely playable with three people, for every queue option you have you make each queue take longer, because it splits the playerbase up. The game doesn't need a seperate queue for 3s right now.
FunkThatBishop Mar 23, 2017 @ 1:44pm 
Then play one of those. Kick a friend out and play dous, or get 2 more and play squad.
zrqm Mar 23, 2017 @ 1:51pm 
I've been playing Squads with 3 people and 4 people, it's still completely playable with 3.
Felky Mar 23, 2017 @ 2:11pm 
My question is what do devs have against 3 Man Teams in general btw; I'm not trying to find a solution or something it's clearly NOT in the game so I'm wondering that's all.
wellikulho Mar 23, 2017 @ 2:30pm 
Jesus christ... when you squad up with 2 other ppl, you are a 3-man squad. Simple as that.
Nokami Mar 23, 2017 @ 2:31pm 
Originally posted by Nosolee:
My question is what do devs have against 3 Man Teams in general btw; I'm not trying to find a solution or something it's clearly NOT in the game so I'm wondering that's all.

As said before, more modes would make any queue longer.
Felky Mar 23, 2017 @ 5:04pm 
Originally posted by Viltsukka:
Jesus christ... when you squad up with 2 other ppl, you are a 3-man squad. Simple as that.
So if we create a group of 3 people and queue up everyone else will be 3 player and the whole game will be 3v3v3v3 ?
Dont Mar 23, 2017 @ 5:12pm 
Let's just havbe a 1s, 2s, 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, and 8s party queues. Im sure the playerbase wouldn't be hurting at all.
Krogan Aug 16, 2017 @ 10:53am 
Why are people acting like this? Nosolee is asking a completely reasonable question.

Originally posted by Dont:
Let's just havbe a 1s, 2s, 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, and 8s party queues. Im sure the playerbase wouldn't be hurting at all.

I guess they should only have 4v4 then? Not to mention that they just split the community from 3 groups to 6 so going to 8 shouldn't be any problem at all. Lastly the playerbase for pubg is enormous, they could easily do all those that you suggest in both 3rd and fpp and have more then enough players for all.
Chaoslink Aug 16, 2017 @ 11:19am 
I queue squads as a duo even all the time. Having one less person isn't a disadvantage, its actually helpful. You have less people to gear meaning each of you will be better geared much earlier, you only need 3 solid scopes over 4, 25% less meds, ammo and boosts, less weapons etc. It can actually be significantly beneficial to be a smaller group. It ONLY becomes an issue late game when only one other squad is against you and they're still a full team. Though even in that case, so long as you attack undetected you can still beat the others just fine.
Aizen Aug 16, 2017 @ 11:23am 
Additionally to what Nokami said, there obviously are priorities. Squads of 3 can play together, end of that. But FPP ONLY was requested far more heavily and thus it makes more sense to introduce that as a new queue over 3/4 mans.

Also, most competetive games either are 1vs1, 2v2 or 5v5. Potentially eveb 6v6. 3 is a rather odd number for that matter. Though 3 mans luckily aren't completely let down as you can queue up for squads and I believe you can also autofill your squad so you dont feel like having a disadvantage.
Messy Aug 16, 2017 @ 11:24am 
you can have a 3 man squad. we do it all the time.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 37 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Mar 23, 2017 @ 1:38pm
Posts: 37