安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Just like when Baal was assailed by tyranids, litterally all chapters of Sons of Sanguinius, but Lamenters, stood in system's defence comiting their full force. All of them came, including renegade Knights of Blood and Flesh Tearers who have bad history with Blood Angels.
Also, contrary to popular belief 'strike cruiser' is not a reference to a particular class or hull but is a broad role term. Any warp-capable craft designed to transport and support a single battle company is called a strike cruiser. The one seen in-game as well as the tt are the ones purpose built for vaunted chapters like the First Founding ones. For many lesser chapters they will make use of Dauntless LCs, Voss-pattern LC's, or any other craft that can be retrofitted to fulfill their needs.
Its sorta funny how you keep linking pictures where you can't see more then 1000 marines.
In the picture linked you can identify less then a 1000 ultramarines, While there is a great blue blob down on the bigger road that could very well be PDF (Macragge PDF using the same shade of blue on their armor as ultramarines), they are way too vague to be identified.
I mean there are pictures with more then a thousand marines that takes place at the time of 40k (As said, artistic license, a argument you simply ignored), you just keep linking pictures were this isent the case.
True, but very few of those have the same blue color on their color scheme as ultramarines. Unless im missing something and they all decided to play dress up as ultramarines when defending macragge? (For honour or something?)
Now, a battlebarge is carrying Battle-Brothers, and so is a Strike Cruiser, but not all of the Astartes aboard that ship will be part of a Company. The Captain, the Fleet Commander, for example, will in almost all cases not be considered part of a COMPANY and will not count toward the Battle-Brother limit. There will be a marine captain aboard each of those Gladius destroyers you throw away also, probably a veteran Marine who is injured or for some other reason incapable of performing his battle-duties in the line.
The marines u send out in thunderhawks and boarding torpedoes and boarding actions? Those would be Battle brothers from a Company.
This is all clearly defined in your Codex.
Edit: Why so big? Big Temples to the Emperor
Damnit. I've been found out.
We've been watching you for some time, Mr. Ander son of Magnus
They probably could carry a lot more marines, but as has been said before, if you are allowed 1000 battle brothers you wouldn't put that many on one ship, but exactly as many as the current mission requires.
Plus: It's Warhammer 40k. Everything is bigger in Warhammer 40k.
I think there's a fan theory that chapters limit how many Marines are on one ship (with 300 max) as the loss of a single ship means the chapter is devastated if there's too many marines on board when it's lost.
Plain wrong. You ever played Tabletop Version?
Bombardment cannons are splendid anti ship weapons