Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
the engines run most efficient (most power for your fuel) at 0.2 stoichiometric.
the formula to calculate the required afr is:
((14-(y*2))*(1-x))+((15-(y*5))*x)
where y is your desired stoichiometric
x is:
clamp(x,0,100)*0.01 where x is the temperature of the engine, i splited this to keep the functions readable
if you divide the air through the fuel from the composite output of the cylinder, you get the current afr of the engine.
then you can use the method of your choise to regulate your fuel and air intake.
but even if you do everything perfect, the old engines will still do 3-4 times as much with the same fuel. so, modular engines are pretty useless right now.
Thank you for posting this formula: I have made a guide with my findings about stoichiometry of modular engines and your discussion was very useful!!!
I think I discovered something useful for you, if you want you can take a look to my guide:
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2786538124