Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Should require a super high gear ratio.
Turbines produce more power at 0 additional cost, besides space, weight, and the actual cost of the turbines.
That or use clutch slipping and flywheels for near infinite power
You can use 1 compressor and cumbustion chamber to run 2 or 3 turbines that run a large generator to make more than enough power to spin a large or medium motor that makes more power than most diesel engines and jet turbines.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2782851241
The biggest downside is fuel consumtion, but tanks are not known for their fuel effeciency.
i have been able to get it to work at 20 rps on the turbine with gearing to the generator to run at 2.3L/s and still run a large motor at full throttle. You can reduce turbine rps if running the motor at lower throttle.
at low speed, than brake steering at high speed