poor preformance on a gtx 950m and gamespeed tied to framerate??

[Stanley]

amazing port for a 10 year old game

[SenMithrarin85]

Bernard Lowe a écrit :

can play the original game with dsfix 1080p 60fps unlocked

whenever it isnt blighttown ofc

here i have to set the res to 900p to get 60fps
gg

yeah...

that game cared about 1 thing, the clock speed of your cpu. High end desktop i7s still get drops in that game. Laptop cpus cannot come close to 4ghz. You only had to rest at a bonfire and your fps would tank.

[Hakyra]

i just tried the game on my crappy laptop, i can confirm this, frame rate is tied to gamespeed.

[Blakido]

Varelius a écrit :

a GTX950M is about comprable to the desktop GTX560 card.
950m is very weak. You should be thankful you're able to even play the game at all.

There is no reason the remaster shouldn't run on a GTX 560 with lowered resolution (not 1080p) considering the improvements over the original aren't groundbreaking. We're talking about a remastered PS3 era game, not about a DS3 equivalent graphically. Even for a PS3 era game it wasn't that look looking and demanding to begin with.

[Stanley]

SenMithrarin85 a écrit :

Bernard Lowe a écrit :

can play the original game with dsfix 1080p 60fps unlocked

whenever it isnt blighttown ofc

here i have to set the res to 900p to get 60fps
gg

yeah...

that game cared about 1 thing, the clock speed of your cpu. High end desktop i7s still get drops in that game. Laptop cpus cannot come close to 4ghz. You only had to rest at a bonfire and your fps would tank.

got a i7-4720hq @ 3.6ghz so dont know what the problem is

also my fps in prepare to die edition never would tank sitting at a bonfire ???

Blackout a écrit :

Varelius a écrit :

a GTX950M is about comprable to the desktop GTX560 card.
950m is very weak. You should be thankful you're able to even play the game at all.

There is no reason the remaster shouldn't run on a GTX 560 with lowered resolution (not 1080p) considering the improvements over the original aren't groundbreaking. We're talking about a remastered PS3 era game, not about a DS3 equivalent graphically. Even for a PS3 era game it wasn't that look looking and demanding to begin with.

this

its a nice remaster and def has some quality of life improvements over the original that will keep me playing but i expected more from the preformance

dont think its my laptops hardwares fault considering i can run games like demon souls in rpcs3 at 1440p 30fps (cuz its capped for now obv untill the 60fps patch is done), and zelda botw at 1440p 30fps in cemu

both games that run in emulators so theyre even more demanding than ur regular dark souls pc port/"remaster" (which feels p much like the hl2 update mod)

[Watergun]

Your graphic card is way below the min. requirement.
http://gpuboss.com/gpus/GeForce-GTX-950M-vs-GeForce-GTX-760#performance

[malice2k]

GTX 850m. Core I7. 8GB mem. 1366*768. 60 fps most of the time. With Vsinc & TXAA. Blur off. Even DS3 runs 35-60 fps on it..

[Watergun]

malice2k a écrit :

GTX 850m. Core I7. 8GB mem. 1366*768. 60 fps most of the time. Win Vsinc & TXAA. Blur off.

Certain aspects still perform better than GTX950M, DS:R is probably one of them.
http://gpuboss.com/gpus/GeForce-GTX-950M-vs-GeForce-GTX-850M#performance

[Stanley]

Watergun a écrit :

Your graphic card is way below the min. requirement.
http://gpuboss.com/gpus/GeForce-GTX-950M-vs-GeForce-GTX-760#performance

imagine having min requirements this high for ur port/remaster of a game from 2011 just to cover up the fact isnt optimized at all

im not saying the remaster is bad bc the the good outweigh the bad but ppl really need to stop defending the bare minimum of work that has gone into this, it just looks sad

[Watergun]

Bernard Lowe a écrit :

Watergun a écrit :

Your graphic card is way below the min. requirement.
http://gpuboss.com/gpus/GeForce-GTX-950M-vs-GeForce-GTX-760#performance

imagine having min requirements this high for ur port/remaster of a game from 2011 just to cover up the fact isnt optimized at all

im not saying the remaster is bad bc the the good outweigh the bad but ppl really need to stop defending the bare minimum of work that has gone into this, it just looks sad

/thread