Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Custom cheats that anti-cheats don't catch costs a lot of money and are not as common as you seem to think they are.
As for your question, OP: The report function in the game was supposed to be tied to the PSN account of the user but since that idea was scrapped due to feedback from the community there is no way to report anyone.
Apparently enough to be a concern.
And the report function should work regardless of the nonsensical psn thing, it doesn't for arbitrary reasons, so i guess you're SOL?
Not arbitrary reasons, but doing so through steam just requires extra effort thus money, to put it simply they would have to request steam ID, work to push a ban for it, it would appear they were just gonna use PSN accounts instead which would be easier on their end rather then extra resources. They get info on cheater, ban PSN account easy, no request for steamID or anything system to check the steam accounts.
Sucks though, why people gotta cheat in random public lobbies.
So you don't know anything about the subject matter and have to resort to insults to try and mask that fact.
I really dislike Sony but that doesn't change the fact that anti-cheats has always functioned under the principle of defeating consumer-grade cheats which are mass-produced. No anti-cheat in the world has ever managed to combat super expensive custom cheats.
Now you know how anti-cheats work. And because you seem to not understand the dialectic process I'll point this out for you as well: Just because I know how anti-cheats function doesn't mean that I condone the level of access they demand.
Not as common nice one.
This isn't your highschool essay. Go try and get any LLM (or what you think is "ai"), to try and make you a cheat. You'll be hard pressed to get it to work. It'd be faster to actually learn coding, script execution, etc. or just go out and buy it.
This gave me a good chuckle reading. This a self report on the lack of technical knowledge and heavy use of AI.
But but but.... you don't want AI to write a code you'll have to spend 5 hours fixing when you could have wrote it in an hour? Lol