Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I would never follow a website review or these "gaming journalism" MOST...MOST time they are just paid by the development team to give good reviews...check diablo 4 critics made by journalists or videogame websites, same with starfield...if you want to get a review, I rather check streamers or small gamers they tend to be more honest and they made it clear when its an ad...but some also get carried by the hype...but its not often
must be that you suck it feels clunky
If a reviewer didn't encounter issues, it's dishonest to pretend they did just for other people's sake.
But the game as a whole with performance,server thing and all?
5 would be generous.