Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you can't get through armor then it's an uphill battle. Marskman rifle isn't cutting it. Breaker is accurate even at long range.
Buff marskman armor penetration and nerf logn range breaker accuracy.
Agreed.
HD1 was plenty hard and ennemies were nowhere near as spongy
Amen to that. I agree with everyone syaing it's rather most of the other weapons underperforming than Breaker being OP.
if weapons unlocked before and after the Breaker labelled EXPLOSIVE and INCENDIARY are underperforming against a basic auto shotty, that should be all the evidence you need to know that something's wrong, not go : 'oh, this weapon is actually strong...and everyone's using it...NERF EVERYTHING! IT SUCKS!!!'
Exactly. Have you tried killing a Brute Guard / Elite Warrior with the Scythe yet? Ridiculous. At least the first game rewarded good aiming, so that crits did the work.
All the other weapons are just ♥♥♥♥♥.