Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So, useful? Definitely. Is it the meta? No. The autocannon can't as easily oneshot things, but it also provides a higher ROF and more flexibility. The Eruptor is also really good vs. bots and is a primary.
So, if you take it, it's still really good once you get used to it, but you may still want to opt for something more flexible or different load out all together.
thats common heavy armor enemy for me. So I guess rail has to be shot at face too ? Like Quasar launcher?
So why do you prefer the autocannon over the railgun? See how you just contradicted yourself.
Sayo either:
A. Thinks he's being funny.
B. Is trying to make a comment on people whining post balance changes
C. Deliberately pretending it isn't useful so that it avoids more scrutiny from the Developers
D. Is a damned fool
Personally, I believe to Sayo's credit it's most likely A, B or C and D is included for completeness.
The Railgun has perfectly valid uses and performance for a bunch of use cases. I encourage you to give it a try and, like MiG-21bis Fishbed-L and supremegreenz10 said, try it in Unsafe mode for particularly hardened targets.
Autocannon gives you higher rate of fire for the cost of a backpack slot (and/or potential for team reloading). But they serve different roles.
So, I should have specified vs. bots. Against bugs, it's kind of lackluster, IMO.
People who tell you it's bad are those who say a weapon is bad when it's not meta. I mean... Sniper rifle as main weapon are bad, railgun isn't.
Is this the best choice ? No. Does it matter ? No. Play what you like, try to see if you can tame it and have fun. It come from someone who take hours on higher difficulty to tame the plasma shotgun and can destroy bot with it, even with people calling it ♥♥♥♥.
Edit: also, ty for the point, always cool to get jester point for just sayin a bitter truth. It make me feel refreshed ^-^
Not every weapon is antitank. People crutched the railgun as antitank.
Antitank rockets are all buffed now. Recoilless, EATs, etc all work fine.
The railgun should have always been treated like a DMR with some skill shot tank busting capabilities. It still works on tanks, cannons, hulks, etc.
If you don't like playing with it then just play with something else.
Cant say for charger, but for titan... lets be honest, even the anti-elite orbital canon ask you at least 2 of them to kill a titan on 7+, i've seen titan take like... 4-5 quasar before going out, and on 9 they often come as a pack of 3.
Any weapon is useless against bile titan, only stratagem and a concentred fire of the whole team with anti-tank is kinda ok. They're a bad exemple, just like factory strider.
Another trade off is that the autocannon is much better at killing tanks and turrets than the railgun, but the railgun's faster reload and being able to reload while running make it better on the move.
So, it really comes down to what you want to do/what your team is asking of it:
Do they want you focusing killing most heavy threats? Railgun.
Do they want you to be more of a jack of all trades who can deal with enemies at an acceptable pace, but also be able to kill fabs? Autocannon.