Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
heck they could atleast have gone the "lazy" Route and added caged and fenced areas on this planet.
The DSS is like a chess piece you move on the map using votes, it gives us advantages on the planet it is in orbit of.
That's also why moving it to Mastia is a terrible move because it does not instant win planets , it gives us an advantage on the ground and now that Gaellivare is under attack under "super defense" conditions we need the DSS there.
Unfortunatly people voted without reading what the DSS does and we are going to lose the advantage of the station in the defense of this planet and as a result we may fail the Major Order...
I hope I'm wrong we can still win but I guess only time will tell.
May liberty guide your steps fellow helldivers!
The DSS is not bad, it is ceremonial just like the rifle.
Yup, that right there. Doesn't change the game in any meaningful way anyway. Just play the game and have fun.
So, it might improve the "strategic gameplay", possibly. We will see.
Don't be always so negative, you guys...
If it didn't exist our gameplay would largely remain the same.
Only a true enemy of managed democracy would say such a thing.