Settings at absolute minimum on 3050 Ti, still terrible performance

[Dark Sun Gwyndolin]

When the game launched, I bought it as part of the hypewave, but only got modest performance, able to get 60 fps at Medium 1080p on a 3050 Ti (4GB VRAM). Now, performance has gone from "poor" to "atrocious". Even on the absolute minimum settings (everything turned down, Ultra Performance, 1080p), I can only hit 45 fps. Any advice?

If the answer is "buy a new PC", I'm waiting for the 50-series cards to release, as it would be silly to spend 4k CAD on a new 4080 PC with the next gen so close.

[Flying Fish]

I'm no expert but 4gb vram in 2024 aint it

not surprising it struggles that badly

[Dark Sun Gwyndolin]

Originally posted by Flying Fish:

I'm no expert but 4gb vram in 2024 aint it

not surprising it struggles that badly

Alright then, guess I'm waiting until 2025 to play this.

[Pctechnik]

a 4080 is just stupidly overpriced and under performs.

I run a 4070 12Gb OC (stock) and easily hit 4k 60fps or 2k 120fps... Do you REALLY need more FPS than you can see?

I did go overboard for some stuff (8Tb storage, 64Gb 6400Mhz DDR5) but I built my machine for CA$3000

[The Empress]

did the sales man make you buy that 4GB Vram crap

if yes make him pay and never buy there again. you got abused

1080p Basic gameing:

crank up cpu to the fastest ya can afford . thats were your frames come mostly.
Vram 10GB to 12GB more doesnt hurt but is most likely unused.
u need this to make it look pretty Not like your 4GB tetris settings.
anny 1440P gfx Card should handle your 1080p

dont fall for 1080p advertisings
they have no headroom for a heavy game load on Nativ Rasterisation.
forget Raytraceing makes no sense on 1080p. if at all



System Ram 16gb barre minimum to 32 Gb . for gameing
more pretty also eats up system ram.

if ya start heavly modding or play games who are developed by useless pigs
this calculations might not suffice .
such games are hammerd down with overpowerd rigs
to make them barly playable

Borg out .

[76561198009276343]

It's not just you. I have a 7900xt and I went from 130FPS back in February to struggling to get 55FPS at the exact same settings. This game's optimization is toast.

[Toshi]

Originally posted by Nephalim Glory:

When the game launched, I bought it as part of the hypewave, but only got modest performance, able to get 60 fps at Medium 1080p on a 3050 Ti (4GB VRAM). Now, performance has gone from "poor" to "atrocious". Even on the absolute minimum settings (everything turned down, Ultra Performance, 1080p), I can only hit 45 fps. Any advice?

If the answer is "buy a new PC", I'm waiting for the 50-series cards to release, as it would be silly to spend 4k CAD on a new 4080 PC with the next gen so close.

14900K, and a 4080 Super; Settings maxed and FPS capped at 144hz and my rig doesn't break a sweat.

[Dark Sun Gwyndolin]

Originally posted by Borg Queen:

did the sales man make you buy that 4GB Vram crap

To be specific, it was a gaming laptop that cost under $1000 CAD, far, FAR less than a proper gaming PC would've cost me at the height of the pandemic. It was always meant to be a stopgap until GPU prices were sane again; it's been good enough for the games I play (mostly older strategy games), and where it isn't, GeForce Now to the rescue.

[Kyle the Karrot]

I get great performance on mid settings 1660 super. Seems like a gpu issue.

[Dark Sun Gwyndolin]

Originally posted by Kingchung07:

I get great performance on mid settings 1660 super. Seems like a gpu issue.

Is there a shader compilation or something that has to happen before the game works properly? I remember my performance sucked when I first played it, but got better over the course of the tutorial. And I've uninstalled and reinstalled it since then.