Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Discussions Rules and Guidelines
Report this post
a) the peak physique perk kicks in when you have a high recoil weapon, fire it, and then try to turn around at full turn. There is a "drag"-variable on some of the weapons that can really slow you down when your stamina bar is depleted, for example, and my impression is that this perk only affects that. When you just aim and flip back and forth, there doesn't seem to be any lowering of the drag threshold past the baseline. Which makes sense. That you'd get a smaller penalty on the aiming when you're pressured, instead of having the entire aiming system removed (like some youtube-people seem to expect should happen now).
b) melee-damage is increased - difficult to tell by how much. Best guess is that there's a change to how direct damage is done in general, and the minor buff on the armor perk is actually really strong compared to the baseline on previous versions.
Superior packing is STILL bugged too
Make sure to use FPV
Also, superior packing broke again on some support weapons that received buffs in recent patch (Spear and railgun for sure in my experience, but not on grenade launcher).
Honestly I don't remember any other game devs that brought so many bugs patch after patch
Something is going to be needed about the armors one of these days, but seeing the weapons problems and statagems problems are still here to stay... Yeah. Maybe before Christmas if we are lucky.
Their assumption is that the aiming in the game is a mechanical, linear function that makes you move the gun and the sights around the player character like you would in blender or something like that. And then that the evil developers are just hampering you with their annoying, Swedish game-design bs by having a threshold value forcing the guns to drag behind the aiming.
What is actually going on is that the aiming in general is set up so you can flip it around based on a progressive scale. So in 3rd person you can basically move the dot/crosshair around in the way the controls allow, at max sensitivity with the mouse, or with flicks on the ps5 controller. Nothing is hindering you from basically snapping around 360 degrees at maximum input threshold here.
After you move around like that and aim with the dot/cross, the animation of the character tries to move along with it. So when you snap around with the sight in 3rd person, the round circle thing comes in afterwards. That is the indicator that suggests where the gun is actually aiming. And the game has a bunch of variables that affect how quickly the character turns around the weapon. Lots of the heavy weapons are pretty slow, so you can see it takes a good while to turn the weapon.
This part of the aiming is what is affected by the peak physique perk. And you can see it working if you are used to flipping around in a slide, and then aiming the other way, and things like that - that it takes a lot less time to get the weapon turned around to point forward.
So if you just move the weapon, on full stamina, around in the 20 degree view in front, you're not actually getting "drag" from the character animation or whatever variable is adding turning delay at all. So there's no difference.
But if you have a heavy weapon and you snap around faster than the character can turn, now you're going to see it.
So basically: perk is completely useless to the "aiming must be 1:1, like in the view port in blender, or my gun-game is bad therefore game is bad" folks. But if you play with "progressive" acceleration zones (see: stupidly named "veteran mode" in the controller settings tab), or with a mouse and kb/analog pad for walking, then you're going to be able to rush in and turn heavy weapons around quicker.
Typical usage scenario - running with a DMR or shotgun with a concrete block attached to the stock, and you want to run past a raider to shoot the guy sitting on it. Or, you want to jump out of the way of a charger and turn 180 degrees to fire the MG at their back -- now you're going to notice it.
Other situations the perk is kind of useful: you have the AMR or Ajudicator, maybe, and you want to quickly switch targets. Instead of having to overshoot with the turning before you switch to the scope, and then forcing it back again, etc., you get a smoother transition to where you were aiming at a quicker pace. Making you able to put shots down where they're supposed to go a lot quicker -- even if the perk doesn't actually have that huge of an impact statistically.
But whatever. I sincerely hope the devs completely ignore all the whining now. Although there's little hope of that with the Sony CMs just "doing their job" and "helping to make the game better", at least for the whiners who don't actually want to play the game the developers made.
It's simple - the perk isn't doing what the description says.
Here's a test with a macro for maximum accuracy
If you don't understand how the perk works, you either
a) don't play the game. Or you have played the game, and are constantly annoyed by that circle thing in the middle of the screen. The one that the tutorial explicitly tells you what is, and where the bullets always seem to go when you fire the weapon. Which still doesn't clue you in on how this works.
b) have convinced yourself that the game should have a camera and an aiming mechanic similar to how you're rotating the view in Blender, and are berating the developers for not ruining the camera controls and the aiming mechanics to suit your whims.
I understand that some of you genuinely hate anything that doesn't have a "1 to 1" aiming system. But please understand that no fps-game made since 2002 - that isn't a tech-demo half a step removed from a 3d editor - has actually had that. CS doesn't have it, Call of Duty doesn't have it. The entire Battlefield-series has always had something similar as well.
You're asking for something that no one wants, criticising a system that works fantastically, with some incredibly silly excuse over a technical gripe.
And I'd completely ignore it - if it wasn't for the fact that Sony's Community Team has jotted down this idiocy in the past and sent it directly to the developer, who has then gone ahead and ruined their game over it. HD2 as well has had the same problem, with turning animation been sped up, with crunching frames on the character movement completely ruining the presentation. And you're likely getting a perk on the equipment specifically tailored to you in the VIP Commandos war-bonds.
But you're asking for something that is going to make the game look and feel extremely bad, that no one who likes to play games over a 3d blender demo context prefers.
And frankly, I don't understand why you're asking for this. It's like I went on the Elden Ring forum to demand an auto-block for the shield - actually provoke the developer to make a change to it - and then demand an auto-riposte as well.
It's just ruining the game. And while I see maybe the value of making it an option, like a mod, that some of you can use while in single-player - you don't see to realize that what you're asking for is going to basically break the game into tiny pieces even in PVE.
But you're not reading, of course, so that's that.
I want a camera to snap to an enemy even before I start to move my mouse