Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
What civilians actually wanted to vote after losing their loved ones?
Not even a day of mourning.
Sounds like the U.S. government to me.
This theory is interesting and has lots of narrative potential, but I'm starting to realize that AH's devs are so unbelievably lazy and incompetent that they're almost certain to miss every golden opportunity and waste pretty much every chance to do something cool/different/interesting/amazing in this game.
So probably this is just them being super lazy and doing things without any forethought.
But the devs are mega lazy, so they couldn't be arsed to do something cool and different like running an ingame election.