Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
A mix of other random grievances as well.
It has something to do with the OP, I promise...
Until the CCP finds some obscure reason to ban the game
found one of the players who lacked reading comprehension
insane to believe I must be chinese to have a logic reason to not hate chinese people. the psn thing was stated it will be added later in the game but people shrug it off then got mad when it was implemented. not so different if you think about it? being mad for something that either was stated or never stated due semantics
It's like if your team in soccer has tons of ball possession but doesn't score any goals. It's great, but if you don't use that advantage to score it doesn't mean anything.
We needed to use the breathing room the percentages in Equality on Sea gave us to save other Mega Cities, and we didn't do that, and because of that we did poorly on this challenge and scored a 28% out of 100%. I'm glad we managed to pull out a victory but it's a failing grade for us no matter how you look at it, and I'm sure it will affect us in the future.
the numbers are perfectly measure regarding mission dificulty and playerbase, this was the point, AH control how the battle goes and decide which city is gonna fall, the players agency is substancial but not as important.