resistance rating on planets 0.5-2.0% etc

[GentleOne]

So for all who haven't found this out by themselves. Stop attacking planets with Avrage ratings with 10k players. the rating stads for how much points will be NEGATED EVERY HOUR. so if 10000 players attack a planet that has lets say a rating of 1.5% and these 10000 manage to accumilate 1.5% liberation per hour.. they gain 0%. I have been watching the Termin sector because i enjoy fighting them the most. And people are lawayxs attacking the same panet with a rating of 1.5% for the past week and have barley made it up to 1.5% and every hour that goes down. Instead of attacking the plnaet next to it that has a rating of 0.5% Could we please get this info spreading..???!!!

[Nihil]

To be honest.....i don't really care about all this.
I have always and will always play planets which have a biom I enjoy the most on the enemy types i enjoy the most.

I prefer bugs so i play bugs even if the MO is for bots or Cuthulu people.
I prefer more barren planets like moon or desert planets. So i play these even if the MO asks me to play swamp planets which i hate
I prefer regular mission types with huge areas so i will play them instead of defensive planets where 2 out of 3 missions are small maps like blitz and extraction missions.

Sorry to say this but.....i paid for the game to enjoy it and not to have it as a 2nd job.

[Sirre]

I don't care about such things, I choose where I play by first picking an enemy faction then a planet I like.
A thing like the "galactic war" simply does not enter the equation, I do not care about contributing to the "effort" I just want to enjoy the game.

[Senrezu]

So for all who haven't found out by themselves: stop telling people how to play their game. We couldn't care less about your planet liberation we just want to play the game.

If I don't want to play on a sandstorm planet your petty little post here won't change that.

Besides... do you really think you could *win* the war? Or lose? You know it's a game and the devs will ALWAYS have some planets to fight for as long as the servers are running no matter how many planets we win or lose.

So please stop these cringe posts and keep you little head canon for yourself.

[Zimos]

tell that to ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ who constantly attack pandion or the other planet in bug front that gains zero progress heres a clue you cant they are as brainless as voteless are by super earth standards

[Nihil]

Originally posted by Zimos:

tell that to ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ who constantly attack pandion or the other planet in bug front that gains zero progress heres a clue you cant they are as brainless as voteless are by super earth standards

Imagine calling people "brainles" or "dlpshlt" just because they want to enjoy the game they play and have zero effect on your game but still mad at them because they don't play like you want them to play. What a lovely time to be alive.

[Axstark]

Sorry, you won't find me on any bug planets, i don't find them fun at all.

That being said, i try to play on planets that have a positive liberation rate, just not on bugs, there are enough players already to take care of the bugs.

[Spirit]

then i suggest you go to martale , its constantly ticking into our favor

[Booba]

Originally posted by Sirre:

I don't care about such things, I choose where I play by first picking an enemy faction then a planet I like.
A thing like the "galactic war" simply does not enter the equation, I do not care about contributing to the "effort" I just want to enjoy the game.

I don't know why so many people want to turn video gaming into drudgery and work but no thank you.

[Jhea]

Originally posted by Sirre:

I don't care about such things, I choose where I play by first picking an enemy faction then a planet I like.
A thing like the "galactic war" simply does not enter the equation, I do not care about contributing to the "effort" I just want to enjoy the game.

the only way to engage with this game.
neither do i care...
tbh i'm more then pleased that some people do the planets and don't get over 0% - why? coz when the planet is lost. the next gets attacked.
so just let people play what they like and be a roadblock for the enemy. they are doing that for about 20 days by now

[Cheez3™]

being honest sir, I dont mind at all, I just play the planets I enjoy, even if a JUNGLE planet is with ZERO decay and for free, I wont play there, cuz I love using eagles and the trees messes with my eagles. as long the planet is cool, I can help all u want, but those swamp maps are unplayable, also I cant go fast with my car in those conditions.

[Din511]

AH will have to make a decision with this, either focus on people who want to contribute to galactic war or drop the pretense of it, as you see here casuals dont care
"well i bought the game so " well so did i and when we fail to get a strategem because none of you cared dont be a crybaby about it
GW is a ongoing narrative giving us different stakes to partake in and as time goes we get more stuff out of it
hd2 wouldnt be half as interesting if it didnt include community affecting GW
like malevolent creek,meridia , x45, calypso and so on
it is becoming more appealing by the day to have more strategems in the warbonds since casuals will just say no to a M.O. related strategem regardless how cool it is like it was with the napalm barrage we fought to the tooth and the nail to get it , if Joel didnt lower the decay we wouldnt have got it a second time
so yeah we cant please both of playerbase

[0rga]

I'm pretty confident that AH will sort that out in the future.
We are into a "campaign" right now but in the coming years, when the live service end, this will be an issue if the game freeze on the same 4 planets for months with zero progression.
Liberation process and enemies attacks have to be reworked to take into account those unable to read or understand map information.
A good chunk of players are limited individuals ("I play only on desert", "I play where I want", "You can't tell me where to play", "I don't care", etc....) and this must be considered.

[Koala 4peace]

Originally posted by Nihil:

To be honest.....i don't really care about all this.
I have always and will always play planets which have a biom I enjoy the most on the enemy types i enjoy the most.

I prefer bugs so i play bugs even if the MO is for bots or Cuthulu people.
I prefer more barren planets like moon or desert planets. So i play these even if the MO asks me to play swamp planets which i hate
I prefer regular mission types with huge areas so i will play them instead of defensive planets where 2 out of 3 missions are small maps like blitz and extraction missions.

Sorry to say this but.....i paid for the game to enjoy it and not to have it as a 2nd job.

Well, i do participate in MOs to a degree, but outside of them i play where i like, too. And i not going to pester others about how they want to play a videogame unless they are actively trolling my matches.

So, OP, this kind of message should be directed to AH. They are the ones that have implemented a design that only works with a small playerbase and/or private servers.

[Koala 4peace]

Originally posted by 0rga:

I'm pretty confident that AH will sort that out in the future.
We are into a "campaign" right now but in the coming years, when the live service end, this will be an issue if the game freeze on the same 4 planets for months with zero progression.
Liberation process and enemies attacks have to be reworked to take into account those unable to read or understand map information.
A good chunk of players are limited individuals ("I play only on desert", "I play where I want", "You can't tell me where to play", "I don't care", etc....) and this must be considered.

Just allowing people to play custom matches, even if no reward is given and no progress in the galactic war is earned, would do wonders for quality of life in this game.

[[Asgard] Thor]

At a certain point, even i stopped caring about efficiency at taking planets. With the recent influx of players doing Illuminate and jacking up the effort to offset the galactic impact mod you aren't going to make an impact unless you can somehow reach out to 75% of the playerbase and have them all agree to a plan. I don't think more than 1,000 players even look at these forums.