Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
That's why even police forces are switching to rifles because SMGs don't really have a good use anymore, even an SBR is way better than a SMG at everything.
The rifles as they are in game don't do enough damage, SMGs are niche and should have high rof and low velocity but in exchange have quick handling, low pen, low damage and low recoil ( even the one handed ones that are terrible in one hand use ).
So that means you haven't used it but are saying that I'm using it wrong and are basing your whole opinion from some YouTube video?
All I'm saying is the reload is long, it has a ton of recoil, it has a small mag size and you can't hit anything past 25m which is exactly what the YouTube "testers" are saying as well
And I agree it should be used one-handed.
post this on their discord and tag the devs
My complaints about a gun are in conflict with it's self? It having a small mag size, massive recoil, can't hit anything past 25m (the SMG says that it's a MEDIUM range weapon FYI) and a 3+ second reload are all in conflict with the gun huh?
Tell me how this SMG having more recoil than the MG 43 is in conflict with the weapon I'm interested. One would imagine that standing and firing a MG 43 at full auto would have more recoil, but it has less recoil than the SMG that has almost half the firing rate and it's half the size
How is a weapon that is told to be a MEDIUM range weapon unable to hit anything at medium range? That's in conflict with it's self. The weapon description also says that the lower rate of fire is supposed to manage and lower the recoil but that's in conflict with it's self
You make it sound like I'm saying the weapon is trash when I'm just say that it has problems and some of them don't make sense and should be fixed. I want a weapon that's told to be a medium range weapon to hit targets at medium range etc etc
Minus the atrocious spread of "fire 30cm to the left at 20m, then maybe 60cm down and to the right the next shot."
Right now it kinda outclasses the Adjudicator
Each bullet of the Reprimand packs a mean punch, but the low rate of fire and low magazine cap means it just can't kill hordes fast enough at higher difficulties. On the other hand, the high spread, high recoil, and dot sight means it isn't good good for long range.
It is, however, REALLY good at picking off armored units at close to medium range. This is due to the gun's exceptional handling, making it easy to quickly aim a three-round burst at weak points.
This good handling is why I think putting the Reprimand in the SMG category works: It doesn't have the stability of a rifle even when you need two hands to use it, but the stubby frame makes it easier to shift your aim than most rifles.
My opinion: treat the Reprimand as a medium armor-buster and pair it with strategems or a support weapon to clear hordes, thermites to kill heavy armor up close, and maybe the EATs or rail cannon strike for killing heavies at range.