Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I agree with the idea for multiple defense planets, even if it was 20 planets at once. Then the planet HP pools could be represented by SEAF resistance, which would be stronger in certain areas. Then it is a mini-game to break through the encirclement and defend the planets that are just behind it since those would probably have a decent defense. I would expect cyberstan to be lost the fastest, given cyborg assistance.
-we could only fight bugs
-some achievements are locked behind specific armies
any of you criticizing the games industry clearly lack the judgement to make a fun game.
This is why it's important. That information lets you know that Super Earth is playing a game. The bugs provide fuel, the bots provide chips for tech.
If we ever pushed them back, made them retreat, or ended them? Not only would Super Earth have no enemy to fuel the propaganda, but Super Earth itself would run low or out of fuel, and chips.
The entire point is that the war benefits Super Earth.
To end it for even an hour is bad for them.
I'm totally fine with this development, we got new missions and new planets to fight on, this is going to be very interesting especially if the cyborgs are going to be involved.