How many FPS do you have?

[RustedReflex]

Specs and graphics settings, please! Feels like the game is a bit unoptimized at the moment.

RX 7700 TX 12 GB, Ryzen 5 5600x, 32 GB RAM here, I have 120 FPS on my ship and 50-80 in game against Automatons, depending on the situation on High graphics.

[Muwa 43]

Rx 6600, Ryzen 5 3600. 16 gb ram. 80 fps on ship and 50-60 fps on battle with automatons
low-medium graphics

[Audiopython]

rx 6900xt, r9 3900x 32gb ddr4 1440p resolution, 120-144fps on ship, varies alot, usually around 70-80 in higher tier maps, i have a mix of high and low settings with balanced render resolution, textures etc still on high, effects skybox etc all set to low, performance is meh comparativeley, other games have no problem pulling 144fps on settings like this on my pc.
some of those games look objectiveley better then hd2 does, leaving me to think optimization is suboptimal.

personally i'd wish they fixed all the crashing first, for good, not this fix it for a week then it comes back again thing they got going on right now

then a performance fix, and then i don't really care what they do, it just irks me to see another developer have a game filled with problems and most of what they do is add more content which will introduce more bugs...

slow down the content, fix the game, then go back to regular content plan, new content doesn't draw people in if they keep crashing.

[Calypso]

i7-10700k, RTX 2060 ko ultra, 16gb RAM. 90 on ship, 50-60 in battle with medium to high settings.

[To0t]

60-130 fps or so at 2560x1440 everything pretty much maxed on rtx 3090 12700K 16gb ram

[dyra55]

Xeon E5-2680V2, GTX 1650 Super, 32GB 1886 Mhz DDR3 RAM, around 40-60 FPS on ship depending on a planet and around 50-76 FPS varies depending on a planet, mission and difficulty fighting automatons on 1080p, all lowest, ultra quality with DX11 and performance config

[Barry Cabbage]

gtx 1060, Intel i7700, 16gb Ram, 30-40 FPS.

[Ahlos]

AMD 7900xt i9-9900k 64gb ram, all ssd. No issues at all on max, steady 120 fps evrywhere.

[Angarvin]

r9 5900x, 6700xt, 32gb. i'm on a 60hz 1080 monitor and i pretty much always sat at said 60 with mid-high settings. untill the recent update, which introduced weird drops into below 20fps.

however i'm pretty sure that said update also introduced a new option: a-sync compute or some such (i don't remember it being present on release). it was off by default. switching it on returned the perfomance back to stable 60.

[Kanharn]

Fully maxed out, 90-120 FPS.

[RustedReflex]

引用自 Kanharn：

Fully maxed out, 90-120 FPS.

What specs do you have?

[killumelucky]

100 - 150 FPS in game at 2560x1440 all settings ultra hight. RTX 4080, i9 11900kf, 32GB RAM.

[fx57]

according to amd 112 fps.

7950X3D 64GB 7800XT

[Saddin]

Overview

Processor: 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-12700K 12/20
Motherboard: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. PRO Z790-A MAX WIFI (MS-7E07)
RAM: 64 GB DDR5
Graphics card1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 (12 GB)
Monitor: Samsung LC27T55 (1920x1080 / 27.7 Inch)
According to Razer Central i average 88 fps in game on maps (setting on max.)
144 on board ship.

[Fluffy]

Ship: 200+ FPS
Game: 100-140 FPS (AA turned off, image sharpening max)

i9-14900K
RTX 4090
192GB DDR5 RAM
2560X1440 Windowed Samsung G9

[fungus]

I got an RTX 4080 with a 13th gen i9 and 64 gbs of DDR5 ram due to a very recent upgrade, game runs at a consistent 100-120 on bots, with very, very occasional dips to 80-90 for a second if like 3 massive explosions go off, but that hasn't happened in a while. Everything at max.

I've seen a lot of AMD users have a ton of issues with running the game, think it might be something to do with anti cheat? Hopefully devs look into it and add some optimisation patches, I shouldn't need this rig to run the game at a consistent high framerate but I'm glad I at least can.