Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That being said, that socket is dead and the best upgrade 9900K is way overpriced second hand so it would be a waste to buy. You'd have to move to a new platform.
What kind of budget are you looking at?
You can press F2 then F3 and F4 to open up the frametime graphs in the game.
From There, you can see whether your CPU is holding you back:
if your GPU frametime is close to your render thread and main thread frametimes, then that means you're CPU bottlenecked, and you should upgrade your CPU.
if the GPU frametime is significantly longer than your render thread and main thread frametimes, then that means you're GPU bottlenecked.
For budget gaming, I highly recommend the Ryzen 5 7600 (non X). Its the best bang for your buck CPU out right now, I have one on a cheap ASRock B650 board and a pair of bare hynix A-die DDR5 clocked to 6400mhz CL32 and it rips.
With an RTX 4090 it comes within 10% in gaming compared to my 7800X3D in the vast majority of games I've tried including stupidly CPU bound games like Starfield.