Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I am actually not sure if we are going to complete our current Major Order of defending 8 planets successfully. We might actually get pushed back by the Automatons a bit.
what an amazing system.. this community wants people to care about the galactic war when in reality everything the community does is absolutely meaningless because the devs control and manipulate everything
i really love the gameplay of this game, but my god are so many systems in this game trash, and not nearly as deep as the community makes people want to believe
Putting it simply, for every hard fought victory, theres appoximately 2-6 failures PER MISSION, galaxy wide. We are being ratio'd.
50% of lobbies on defense robots planets are just farming eradicate and abandoning.. many others which try to do evac are failing it..
if what you are saying is true then explain to me how we have 4 of 8 planets successfully defended?
it is indeed rigged and meaningless
Because of this little train of thought right here. People who can and have, and do beat the evacs, are out ratio'd by defeatists who went to fight bugs or offensive operations elsewhere, AND the memers (did I create a word??) fighting for Space Veitnam and Starship Tooper's Planet P, and the min/max groups power leveling through and then complaining the game is stale i.e. they burnt themselves out.
The math do indeed be mathing.