One twitter post.. "The game is dying!"...

[Nilly-San]

The Community spurs and explodes saying the devs suck and are at fault, holy moly this is a mess.

Game development takes time, this is the exact same thing that happened with Lethal Company, Only major difference is that is made by one guy, and this team is passionate about the game, I'd like to think they aren't forced to work on it every second of the day and are given proper breaks inbetween updates and such.

So just, stop with these stupid Bait Posts, Let the Devs make the game how they want.

I totally understand the bad Balance Patches though.

[Herald_UK]

Social media is Cancer-Aids for the soul... And like a Ouija Board, best left well alone

And no, the irony hasn't escaped me lol...

[MarQan]

Twitter is irrelevant, users there don't represent any community.

[LeftIsBest-James]

It doesn't matter who's responsible, or who's passionate.
Only implemented changes matter.

Next Patch is make or break.
Future patches may happen, but only the next one matters.

[Soji]

you can thank decades of live service games rotting gamers brains for that. Most of those people probably weren't even alive for a time before weekly patches were even possible, let alone common.

[アンジェル]

Originally posted by Nilly-San:

One twitter post.. "The game is dying!"...
The Community spurs and explodes saying the devs suck and are at fault, holy moly this is a mess.

Game development takes time, this is the exact same thing that happened with Lethal Company, Only major difference is that is made by one guy, and this team is passionate about the game, I'd like to think they aren't forced to work on it every second of the day and are given proper breaks inbetween updates and such.

So just, stop with these stupid Bait Posts, Let the Devs make the game how they want.

I totally understand the bad Balance Patches though.

If you are against bait posts, why are you adding one?

[Skrain]

Originally posted by Soji:

you can thank decades of live service games rotting gamers brains for that. Most of those people probably weren't even alive for a time before weekly patches were even possible, let alone common.

The good old days when internet wasn't a collective thing, and if you were desperate you bought a game guide to figure things out. I still have my Suikoden 3 and FFX guide me and my brother bought as kids. Video games were better back then

[pseudo]

Originally posted by Nilly-San:

So just, stop with these stupid Bait Posts

you first

[Nilly-San]

Originally posted by アンジェル:

Originally posted by Nilly-San:

One twitter post.. "The game is dying!"...
The Community spurs and explodes saying the devs suck and are at fault, holy moly this is a mess.

Game development takes time, this is the exact same thing that happened with Lethal Company, Only major difference is that is made by one guy, and this team is passionate about the game, I'd like to think they aren't forced to work on it every second of the day and are given proper breaks inbetween updates and such.

So just, stop with these stupid Bait Posts, Let the Devs make the game how they want.

I totally understand the bad Balance Patches though.

If you are against bait posts, why are you adding one?

This is not a bait post this is a genuine thing for me to say as a Game dev myself, That people do these kinds of things and disheartens developers.

[Soji]

Originally posted by Helldivers™ 2:

Originally posted by Soji:

you can thank decades of live service games rotting gamers brains for that. Most of those people probably weren't even alive for a time before weekly patches were even possible, let alone common.

This is complete bs. Old games were complete and just worked. They were mostly passion projects (not all of them) by rare engineers.

Not this ultra monetized spreadsheet-driven shovelware by incompetent devs that can't even notice bugs that appear with ONE test. The devs are at fault for every issue this game has had

no, its not bs. A game is not dead that got updated a few weeks ago. Dead games don't get updated. Didn't finish the rest of what you said cause its not related to what i said, sounds like you just wanted to vent, which fair i guess.

[Nilly-San]

Originally posted by pseudo:

Originally posted by Nilly-San:

So just, stop with these stupid Bait Posts

you first

This. Is. Not. A. Bait. Post
You’re assuming it is when it’s not, I made the post, you clearly didn’t read it.

[Nilly-San]

Originally posted by Helldivers™ 2:

Originally posted by Soji:

you can thank decades of live service games rotting gamers brains for that. Most of those people probably weren't even alive for a time before weekly patches were even possible, let alone common.

This is complete bs. Old games were complete and just worked. They were mostly passion projects (not all of them) by rare engineers.

Not this ultra monetized spreadsheet-driven shovelware by incompetent devs that can't even notice bugs that appear with ONE test. The devs are at fault for every issue this game has had

Old games were also made to be done then and there, now we live in a time where updating the game with new content keeps the game alive, Which I understand people get bored, peoples attention span has also just gotten significantly lower I’ve noticed.

[Herald_UK]

Originally posted by Nilly-San:

Originally posted by Helldivers™ 2:

This is complete bs. Old games were complete and just worked. They were mostly passion projects (not all of them) by rare engineers.

Not this ultra monetized spreadsheet-driven shovelware by incompetent devs that can't even notice bugs that appear with ONE test. The devs are at fault for every issue this game has had

Old games were also made to be done then and there, now we live in a time where updating the game with new content keeps the game alive, Which I understand people get bored, peoples attention span has also just gotten significantly lower I’ve noticed.

As an older gamer, this isn't exactly true. the only reason games die is if a) they're not worth remembering or b) the hardware no longer exists that will run them. Content has nothing to do with it, or at least not as much as you would think. A classic is still a classic and will always be a classic.

No one will be playing any of this live service crap that's about today 20 years from now. They will however still be playing the classics of yesteryear. Bubble Bobble, Mario, Sonic Trico Golden age Coin-Op stuff etc... It's guaranteed.

[Filzar Geynep]

I leggit cannot take a game of my steam's librairy that wasn't called "dead" or got the developpers accused of being lazy at least once.

It's like people expect all video games to be nothing but perfection in one of the worst time period to be a game dev. With deadlines, layoffs, higher ups stupid agendas and consummers crying out loud for the most minor incovenience and not understanding ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ about how games are made and the time it takes.

At this point I seriously wonder what are these people's threshold of what is considered quality and good management, because I cannot think of a single game that fits those requirements

I feel like the further you stay from any video game communities, the better it is.

[Nilly-San]

Originally posted by Herald_UK:

Originally posted by Nilly-San:

Old games were also made to be done then and there, now we live in a time where updating the game with new content keeps the game alive, Which I understand people get bored, peoples attention span has also just gotten significantly lower I’ve noticed.

As an older gamer, this isn't exactly true. the only reason games die is if a) they're not worth remembering or b) the hardware no longer exists that will run them. Content has nothing to do with it, or at least not as much as you would think. A classic is still a classic and will always be a classic.

No one will be playing any of this live service crap that's about today 20 years from now. They will however still be playing the classics of yesteryear. Bubble Bobble, Mario, Sonic Trico Golden age Coin-Op stuff etc... It's guaranteed.

I agree to this.

[Nilly-San]

Originally posted by Filzar Geynep:

I leggit cannot take a game of my steam's librairy that wasn't called "dead" or got the developpers accused of being lazy at least once.

It's like people expect all video games to be nothing but perfection in one of the worst time period to be a game dev. With deadlines, layoffs, higher ups stupid agendas and consummers crying out loud for the most minor incovenience and not understanding ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ about how games are made and the time it takes.

At this point I seriously wonder what are these people's threshold of what is considered quality and good management, because I cannot think of a single game that fits those requirements

I feel like the further you stay from any video game communities, the better it is.

THIS FOR SURE