Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
My setup
CPU i9 13900kS cooled EK delta TEC 2
RX 7900 XTX Liquid Devil Edition GPU
RAM 64Gb 7600Mhz
SSD Nvme M.2 4TB 980 Pro
RESOLUTION 3440x1440p 240Hz
Personally, I have bad performance and without taking into account the problem of connecting to the servers with the error code -1. In my opinion I'm going to wait a while and then buy it again.
For some reason raw input is broken. The game is very smooth until you move your mouse with mouse smoothing disabled. I noticed that controller input is perfect, and was confused until I found this.
I'd take a small amount of input delay vs using sticks any day of the week, until the issue is fixed. Many Playstation titles suffer from mouse input issues at launch and HD2 is no different.
FWIW I'm running on a 6700XT with 5700g CPU, and have AFMF and FSR from 1080p to 1440p forced, as the in-game upscaler is garbage. Average 150-200fps with frame gen most of the time but in heavy situations my CPU goes above 80% usage and it drops to 120-130fps fake frames, or 60-70fps real frames.
I can imagine the PS5 struggles with framerate on heavy scenes due to the ancient CPU.
Helldivers 2 does not have frame generation.
Most devs don't care anymore. The consumers are the issue, as they seemingly buy anything regardless of performance. Just look at home many dumpster fire PC ports have been in the Steam top sellers recently with "Very Positive" overall reviews, yet Digital Foundry and many others have shown that 0% budget went into optimisation.
It's the same reason millions buy iPhones every year. They don't care about performance or value, just whatever is "in".
Did I at any point say Helldivers 2 had frame generation?
Spotted the Nvidia user.
Wrong information, wrong user to cause silly arguments with.
what crack are you on 60 FPS is perfect and you won't notice anything about 90, literally 90% of humans can't physically see the difference somewhere above 60 to begin with thats been proven over and over at studies. Insanely high FPS is just something thats pushed by PC makers to get you to buy overly expensive components. FYI i get good FPS even on my PC from 2016 the game is WELL DAMN OPTIMIZED.
My PC can't run 9/10 games released in the last few year and usually not the ones it can well but this works just fine to the point i give props to the dev for doing such a good job well optimizing it tho that seems to be a trend with PSN games released on PC over the last few years.
Eyy, we have almost the same setup.
5120x1440 / 4080 Super / 32gb ram / 5800x Ryzen 3.8ghz / m.2 hosts OS & secondary m.2 hosts steam.
I used the "high" preset, turned off depth of field (don't ilke it), turned off motion blur (loathe it), set it to render in native resolution but otherwise don't recall messing with the settings any, don't use Gsync though, that might be a problem I've known Gsync to act real weird with some games.
Any case the game runs smooth as butter and hasn't crashed since their last patch.
It's very easy to notice anything above 60. The input lag improvements alone are worth going as far above 60 as possible. And thats just the gameplay feel.
Visuals are noticeably smoother, as your eye is literally receiving more information to fill in the gaps that 60hz would have.
I feel sorry for anyone who sticks to the whole "humans can't see above 60fps" rhetoric. It's like they're unable to change their own opinion because Karen from a random Google News site said so.
I've been using a 280hz panel for almost a year now, and it's disgusting going back to 144hz. Would I get used to it again? Sure eventually. But why downgrade when your eyes love them some sweet sweet hz increase?
The pinnacle will be 500hz OLED most likely, but as a fun game go to UFO Test and try their black frame insertion feature. You'll see straight away just how good motion clarity can be above 60hz.
For me the biggest difference is with increased motion clarity. LCD's and Oled's have a lot of motion blur at 60 fps. It's actually even more noticable on a controller because of the slow turn speed. It's also noticable during desktop use. Scrolling this forum for example looks so much better at 120hz over 60.
And yes you said so.
"FWIW I'm running on a 6700XT with 5700g CPU, and have AFMF and FSR from 1080p to 1440p forced, as the in-game upscaler is garbage. Average 150-200fps
You were talking about the game in your post.
No idea why you are trying to insult people when your brain doesnt even function well enough to remember what you just said.
3060ti
32g ram
and the game runs buttery smooth for me.