Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
As wrong as it might seem to me it has the potential for everybody to learn some things so why let the opportunity go away?
Just don't take it too seriously and most important don't start to identify yourself with your own position and you can have alot of fun in these discussions ;)
Here's hoping for the best, but that doesn't say much. It has no other real MP competition. Suicide Squad topped the list too and for a live service game had pitiful peak numbers, less than half of Marvel Avengers and we know how that went.
I'm hoping between crossplay and the game hopefully being good it gets legs, though the devs still actually have to add content to validate the live service part.
Darktide forgot that part I guess.
I'm not twisting anything, what you stated was devoid of context that your source provided. "At the moment" can mean any number of different things, while your source was rather pin point in explaining that in the grand scheme of things, it doesn't really mean much. Which you seem to agree with in any case.
Point is, your claim was misleading even if technically correct in the most pedantic of ways.
Sounds like wishful thinking on your part without more numbers.
The comparison is there to illustrate that irrespective of a game being on the top sellers list for quite some time (Like "Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League"), it's ultimately a shallow "victory" at the end of the day.
At the end of the day, it doesn't mean much and you can have all the wishful thinking in the world that this trend will blossom into something more, but much like "Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League" proved, it doesn't always mean that.
Helldivers 2 has the backing of Sony and Arrowhead at this point in time has already made countless games. To the point where they could afford to have ~9 years between their last game and their most recent game (Helldivers 1 & Helldivers 2). It's far removed from being a small production like Magicka 1 was.
As for the last part, again, that's wishful thinking not based on any hard data available. A shallow "victory" at best.
That's kind of my point in that it's really hard to gauge anything from the top seller chart unless it's on there for weeks at a time.
People out here pretending that this game is pulling in Baldur's Gate 3 numbers because it has a spot in the top sellers list... for now.
Doubt.
The top sellers charts are just overall useless, games like CoD will jump to the top just because they threw out a new $40 skin pack of Snoop Dog.
It's also weighed against competition, so you really need the context of what else is there, i.e. Helldivers 2 is basically the game of the week and has zero competition on Steam, especially in the multiplayer space which tends to do big.
The only time the top sellers is impressive is when games like Baldur's Gate 3 are still way up there for this long, because it already sold so well and pulled such high player numbers that it's kind of bonkers there are still tons of people buying it weekly three months after release.
I hope the game is everything the devs have said it will be and that they are fair about how the MTXs will work but I have been burned way too many time with promises of the grind being "not that bad" for me to be excited. Better to be indifferent about it as you won't be disappointed.
I think everybody who's bringing up that it's a top seller is just coping. If they actually felt like the game was going to be successful they wouldn't feel the need to go argue with people on the forums about it.
It's kind of funny how some people feel the need to defend the honour of these soulless corporations, for free. xD
I didn't mean to imply you weren't sorry if it came off that way. I want the game to be great but I am not blind to some potential issues that can come from the way they are doing some things.
Let´s what software and hardware issues will be coming up day one...