Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Left 4 Dead 2 has more stuff. If you want an actual zombie apocalypse experience, go with Left 4 Dead. If you just want to kill zombies and mod everything in sight, go with Left 4 Dead 2.
They are different games with different designs, anyone who says Left 4 Dead is completely in Left 4 Dead 2 is lying to you.
Not at all. I just prefer L4D2 and don't mind any of the changes they made to the maps when they were ported over. Granted, I love L4D1, but if you're going to buy only one game, L4D2 seems like the better option.
And we've only been comparing the original maps, not mentioned the new maps, weapons etc in L4D2.
This topic, from what I understand, is to consider the whole game
And "retro" mods and mutations still can't excuse the missing or simply not used dialogue lines for the ported campaigns, nor the gauntlet crescendos that have been moved in. Try any of the godforsaken gauntlets in the ports without a melee weapon, and you will not be happy, even without Chargers.