Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I think in cases like this more videos should be provided to even decide if someone is a cheater, I know people call me a cheater when I either shoot through walls at them or 180 turn and shoot.
Tl;dr
Not too much evidence to go of, but it does appear they are snapping around which may mean cheats or a pro with a potato router.
I'll add more when I get onto my PC to look more at vid.
Exactly what i thought.
Any non-headshots are due to a common running infront, I think they are cheating, poorly hidden one too due to the snappy nature.
I want to doubt it, but it seems likely, but yet more videos of the match would actually help more.
You can't really call someone a cheater just by a video.
A real player will always have overcompensation, while cheats will have the crosshair lock on pitch-perfectly to the target. It's humanly impossible to consistently be pixel-perfect with accuracy, especially on moving targets. there'll be slight overshooting, meaning the player has to compensate for that.
It's really hard to tell because the video has such low quality that you can't make out any details at all.
You can see for yourself here, the video is slowed down by 0.300x and is zoomed in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTRcg2_N6dY&feature=youtu.be
I as with a few of the people above though dont think he is hacking, because the crosshair doesnt snap to heads as you would expect, but of course that might have been the heads on his end.
Nothing wierd about that. You can tell from the path the CI is taking that it is going for the fence to climb even if you didnt know Coach was boomed. Ignoring that common would be normal.
Because of where coach is, the only commons that are worth shooting are the ones climbing up directly beneath him. He should be able to handle the two other directions that commons can be coming from (walking along the fence) especially since commons climbing up the fence close to the person being spectated are more likely to just fall off the fence than to get to coach.
As to why he shot up the ramp instead of shooting one that got a hit on coach, who knows, nothing suspicious about it though, may have simply not realised coach wasn't going to shove it.
You're comparing apples to oranges
Although I've mostly seen them used in games similar to TF2 where it's a team versus a team with nothing like commons running about, usually you don't see them since they just hunt people to bully them and what not, of course most people wouldn't use that type of aimbot on L4D2 for obvious reasons. (Edit: To add onto the example of TF2, one could for example make it target a spercific class too. Like when playing as a heavy aimbot at all Spies and Scouts, but that's just an example based on TF2, that even still is redundent, hence why it lacks use.)
But then again, I still wouldn't see the point of using an aimbot like that, especially in L4D2.
Likewise I think we can all agree there isn't actually enough evidence to convict the user of hacking or not.