Deep Rock Galactic
FSR 2.0 worse than FSR 1.0...
I tried out the new FSR 2.0, and it has worse performance and makes the game look worse than FSR 1.0. Is this intended or is there some kind of mistake? I thought FSR 2.0 was supposed to be better looking and more optimized than 1.0....
< >
Showing 1-10 of 10 comments
Chibbity Sep 8, 2022 @ 3:48pm 
Which quality setting were you using?

I see a pretty decent improvement performance wise from 1.0 to 2.0 on my end? (I had to use Balanced on 1.0, but with 2.0 I can use the highest FSR quality setting.)
Last edited by Chibbity; Sep 8, 2022 @ 3:53pm
Lord Griswold Sep 8, 2022 @ 3:52pm 
Originally posted by Chibbity:
Which quality setting were you using?
I use performance because I play on a laptop. Performance for FSR 1.0 looks way better and gives a massive fps boost for me
Chibbity Sep 8, 2022 @ 3:57pm 
Originally posted by Lord Griswold:
I use performance because I play on a laptop. Performance for FSR 1.0 looks way better and gives a massive fps boost for me

You double checked that FSR 2.0 is also on performance setting right?

It's a pretty new option so maybe it's something specific about your hardware?
ahv Sep 9, 2022 @ 2:15am 
FSR 2 only raises quality, performance wise it's a bit worse than FSR 1.
Looks like ♥♥♥♥ on the Steam deck. FSR 1 is pretty great.
RaNdOmKiLs666 Sep 9, 2022 @ 4:23am 
Here's my thoughts on the 3 Upscaling options we have.

1. FSR 1.0 looks like crap to me, very blurry. Like an old PS2 game. Don't recommend using this at all.

2. FSR 2.0 looks a bit less blurry then 1.0 to me, but still not an acceptable quality imo. Use it if you are struggling to get a solid 60FPS.

3. DLSS looks very close to native for me, only the textures seem to suffer minor quality loss. Great FPS booster. Use it if you have an RTX card and want more frames.
Bazingarrey Sep 9, 2022 @ 5:45am 
Originally posted by RaNdOmKiLs666:
Here's my thoughts on the 3 Upscaling options we have.

1. FSR 1.0 looks like crap to me, very blurry. Like an old PS2 game. Don't recommend using this at all.

2. FSR 2.0 looks a bit less blurry then 1.0 to me, but still not an acceptable quality imo. Use it if you are struggling to get a solid 60FPS.

3. DLSS looks very close to native for me, only the textures seem to suffer minor quality loss. Great FPS booster. Use it if you have an RTX card and want more frames.
Waiting for FSR 2.1
Pepito Sep 9, 2022 @ 6:28am 
fsr 2 is more taxing from my experience in different games
ShadyMan Oct 29, 2022 @ 4:55am 
I have 105 fps in native and 110 with FSR 2.0 quality (with quite worse visual effects for smoke, fire, hologram and constant flickering), is it supposed to work that way? :spazdunno:
Chibbity Oct 29, 2022 @ 5:02am 
Originally posted by ShadyMan:
I have 105 fps in native and 110 with FSR 2.0 quality (with quite worse visual effects for smoke, fire, hologram and constant flickering), is it supposed to work that way? :spazdunno:

It's supposed to give you better FPS for a slight quality hit, yes; what did you think it was supposed to do?
< >
Showing 1-10 of 10 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Sep 8, 2022 @ 3:41pm
Posts: 10