Content Creator Partner DLC

[[deleted]]

Any way to get it? I don't buy games if I can't get 100% of it.
So is there any way to get that dlc?

[Sokaku]

I personally don't spend my nights worrying about everyone else. It isn't giving some players an advantage over others. (pay-to-win, or pitch-to-win)

Other content that you cannot get as a new player, or may have to wait for are the celebratory or special event cosmetics. Examples being the hats for Halloween and anniversary. Each Halloween they have released a new hat/mask, and last year I think they originally planned to allow players access to the previous years' hats/masks temporarily, keeping only that current year mask. There was a pretty vocal outcry from the community asking to keep the previous year hats/masks at the end of the event, GSG listened to the community and let everyone keep the older Halloween hats. I was happy with that decision as I really liked the Witch's hat & pumpkin head more so than the demon mask for last year. This year I suspect they'd do the same, but there are things you might see like anniversary hats. Again, it's a "thank you" gift for people that supported the game when they did, nothing more, nothing less.

[Nosteru]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DeadBeat:

snip

This is silly, you disagree to some get a virtual unique item, but totaly okay with real stuff like a T-Shirt?
Hey I play their game, I demand T-shirt too then! We are equal.

[Garlboh]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Nosteru:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DeadBeat:

snip

This is silly, you disagree to some get a virtual unique item, but totaly okay with real stuff like a T-Shirt?
Hey I play their game, I demand T-shirt too then! We are equal.

Read my post slower next time.

I only mentioned free, never exclusive. Besides, there's literally no limit to virtual items. T-Shirts? They'd probably run out of cloth.

[Nosteru]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DeadBeat:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Nosteru:

This is silly, you disagree to some get a virtual unique item, but totaly okay with real stuff like a T-Shirt?
Hey I play their game, I demand T-shirt too then! We are equal.

Read my post slower next time.

I only mentioned free, never exclusive. Besides, there's literally no limit to virtual items. T-Shirts? They'd probably run out of cloth.

With your no limit of virtual item logic every game should be free as you can copy them infinite times.
Nothing to re-read about your comment slower or faster. Your problem with these items is just silly.

[Garlboh]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Nosteru:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DeadBeat:

Read my post slower next time.

I only mentioned free, never exclusive. Besides, there's literally no limit to virtual items. T-Shirts? They'd probably run out of cloth.

With your no limit of virtual item logic every game should be free as you can copy them infinite times.
Nothing to re-read about your comment slower or faster. Your problem with these items is just silly.

I don't exactly understand where you're getting this idea from, but no. I don't believe every game should be free.

I'm not sure what's hard to understand about wanting games to have content parity. I buy the game, I get the game, the game is the same game as everyone else got when they paid the same money. Which isn't the case here.

Any questions I guess?

[Chibbity]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DeadBeat:

Any questions I guess?

You have 20 hours played, which means I'm going to assume you haven't earned the level 100 exclusive gear.

The average DRG players spends 30 hours overall playing the game. That level 100 gear is as unreachable to the average player as the streamer/Youtube armor is to you.

Do you find the level 100 exclusive gear to be unfair, and if so; what makes it different from any other cosmetic that the vast majority of players will never earn?

[Addison1024]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Chibbity:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DeadBeat:

Any questions I guess?

You have 20 hours played, which means I'm going to assume you haven't earned the level 100 exclusive gear.

The average DRG players spends 30 hours overall playing the game. That level 100 gear is as unreachable to the average player as the streamer/Youtube armor is to you.

Do you find the level 100 exclusive gear to be unfair, and if so; what makes it different from any other cosmetic that the vast majority of players will never earn?

Probably that you can earn it if you just play the game, I assume, it the patterns of this argument continue

[Garlboh]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Chibbity:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DeadBeat:

Any questions I guess?

You have 20 hours played, which means I'm going to assume you haven't earned the level 100 exclusive gear.

The average DRG players spends 30 hours overall playing the game. That level 100 gear is as unreachable to the average player as the streamer/Youtube armor is to you.

Do you find the level 100 exclusive gear to be unfair, and if so; what makes it different from any other cosmetic that the vast majority of players will never earn?

Everyone has time, not everyone has a silver tongue.
One costs £25, another costs at least £100.
The game can have a low difficulty, content creation is pretty damn difficult.
Level 100 gear generally has no extra steps involved other than... well, playing the game. Crazy, I know, Imagine that.

Also, I moved from Xbox, still wasn't level 100 but I'd say my general hours reach 60 altogether when combined with Steam. I can link my profile if needed.

[GIRL]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DeadBeat:

That's just a fact, we've seen it happen, even with indie devs.

Ah, the 'ol "It's happened before, ergo it's GOING to happen" argument. I guess that's what happens when you cross the line from being cautious to being utterly paranoid.

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DeadBeat:

I just find it strange that seemingly most of the community is perfectly fine with... when it comes down to it, game content being exclusively restricted to a popularity contest. You can call it small, or just cosmetic, or whatever excuse you can think of next, but I'm not wrong.

It encourages players to make content. Calling it a "popularity contest" is like saying jobs play favoritism by only paying people who show up. If you want the armor yourself, it's totally free. You just have to, god forbid, work a bit for it. It's only "restricted content" because you have a defeatist mindset.

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DeadBeat:

I'm an art before the artist kinda person, thank god.

What does this even have to do with anything, lmao?

[Nosteru]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DeadBeat:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Nosteru:

With your no limit of virtual item logic every game should be free as you can copy them infinite times.
Nothing to re-read about your comment slower or faster. Your problem with these items is just silly.

I don't exactly understand where you're getting this idea from, but no. I don't believe every game should be free.

I'm not sure what's hard to understand about wanting games to have content parity. I buy the game, I get the game, the game is the same game as everyone else got when they paid the same money. Which isn't the case here.

Any questions I guess?

Again if you want that armor go and stream the game or upload youtube movie about game. Nothing hold you from that. If you dont work for it then you cant earn it, very simple. Again youthink everything can be earned by money, you realy prove that.

[Garlboh]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Nosteru:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DeadBeat:

I don't exactly understand where you're getting this idea from, but no. I don't believe every game should be free.

I'm not sure what's hard to understand about wanting games to have content parity. I buy the game, I get the game, the game is the same game as everyone else got when they paid the same money. Which isn't the case here.

Any questions I guess?

Again if you want that armor go and stream the game or upload youtube movie about game. Nothing hold you from that. If you dont work for it then you cant earn it, very simple. Again youthink everything can be earned by money, you realy prove that.

Again again I'm going to. My assumption is I'll lack an audience and nothing will happen, no matter how hard I work on it. It's a win-win for me either way. I've mentioned this before. Also, I have never mentioned wanting to buy the DLC, just that it was accessible to everyone. If I make a single ♥♥♥♥♥♥ video and instantly get the skin, then I will absolutely consider that accessible for everyone.

That won't happen though, I'd put money on it.

Besides, there's still the anniversary skins. For that, I'd have to build a time machine. How much work is too much I wonder?

[Chibbity]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DeadBeat:

Besides, there's still the anniversary skins. For that, I'd have to build a time machine. How much work is too much I wonder?

You weren't there for the anniversary, you don't get the skin; simple.

That's literally what makes it an anniversary skin.

Deal with it?

[Garlboh]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Chibbity:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DeadBeat:

Besides, there's still the anniversary skins. For that, I'd have to build a time machine. How much work is too much I wonder?

You weren't there for the anniversary, you don't get the skin; simple.

That's literally what makes it an anniversary skin.

Deal with it?

Sorry I don't appreciate games having restricted content?

Deal with it?

[Chibbity]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DeadBeat:

Sorry I don't appreciate games having restricted content?

Deal with it?

I'll give you three guesses whether you or the game is going to change first; and the first two don't count.

[Garlboh]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Chibbity:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DeadBeat:

Sorry I don't appreciate games having restricted content?

Deal with it?

I'll give you three guesses whether you or the game is going to change first; and the first two don't count.

Oh I don't expect the game to change, I don't expect the developers to make the content available.

If a miracle does happen, the community will fight it and the majority vote will win. The content will 99.9% stay exclusive to the few, leaving the game incomplete for most.

Just a guess of course, gotta state that before someone responds with a classic quote.

All I wanted to do was throw in my small hat, that it's kinda ♥♥♥♥♥♥. Weirdly blew up.