Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But why do you want to use two vents or even two sensor? You get the same reading from both and the vent can be switched between outward or inward direction.
More vents in the same airlock lead to faster cycles, which is great if you don't want to wait ages for a cycle to be done. You're wrong though. In my tests, it IS possible to use multiple vents with an airlock control. Vents are just... finicky. Even without an airlock control sometimes they just... spit out errors. Even if they're properly connected to a pipe network. There's some sort of reason this is happening, but we don't know what it is. It just seems random.
This doesn't always work, from my experience. Sometimes only moving pipes does. This is a really weird issue.