Stationeers

Stationeers

View Stats:
Brakiri Dec 31, 2019 @ 2:49am
Atmosphere filtration on Mars
Hi folks,

i'm trying to use the atmosphere to filter out Nitrogen for the jetpack.
The atmosphere has only trace amounts but over time it should be ok.

Problem is, i cannot get this filtration to work.

I tried an active vent connected to a filtration unti and an active vent on the other side to pump the unfiltered gases back into the atmosphere.

Problem here is, the active vent sucks in more atmosphere than the filtration unit can process so the pipe leading from the sucking active vent to the filtration unit builds up pressure until it explodes.

I looked for some advice here in the forums and i tried using a volume pump and a pressure regulator but both times, they did nothing, the pipe leading to the filtration unit had no preessure whatsoever and no gases were filtered.

So a little help would be appreciated.
Last edited by Brakiri; Dec 31, 2019 @ 2:50am
< >
Showing 1-11 of 11 comments
Brakiri Dec 31, 2019 @ 2:55am 
Ah, i think i got it..you need more than one piece of pipe between the active vent and the filtration unit. In this config it doesn't build up pressure anymore.
Tonique Dec 31, 2019 @ 3:12am 
Right. :se:
Kastuk Dec 31, 2019 @ 5:55am 
You can use any gas for propellant.
Monty Jan 1, 2020 @ 12:19am 
On Mars i would swap the nitrogen tank to a CO2 tank for propellant as soon as possible.

Just be aware that whatever gas you use in your jetpack is put into the enviroment around you. Experience taught me not to use hydrogen in an O2 rich enviroment.
Adam De Beers Jan 2, 2020 @ 7:06am 
Yo yo!

Maybe this helps a bit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITa8vHcCi3o
Kevin Jan 7, 2020 @ 2:34pm 
Use a passive vent, the filter will suck all it needs, and a passive to expel waste. You will still need to monitor the tank though
Last edited by Kevin; Jan 7, 2020 @ 2:36pm
hektor Jan 7, 2020 @ 4:32pm 
And back pressure regulator for safety.
Radioshow Jan 7, 2020 @ 5:41pm 
A BPR will just cause the pipe before it to burst without some form of automated valve/vent
hektor Jan 7, 2020 @ 6:55pm 
Well of course sorry I didn't give more detail but one should be in there somewhere unless you get digital valve fancy.
Trash Templar Jan 8, 2020 @ 10:42am 
Originally posted by Monty:
On Mars i would swap the nitrogen tank to a CO2 tank for propellant as soon as possible.

Just be aware that whatever gas you use in your jetpack is put into the enviroment around you. Experience taught me not to use hydrogen in an O2 rich enviroment.

makes sense and is much easier to get. easiest way for propellant is always the gas most or easiest accessable.(not sure if N2 leaves the jetpack in pure form or oxidated; never had issues with N2 usage this way on mars; but still right as a principle).



Originally posted by Kevin:
Use a passive vent, the filter will suck all it needs, and a passive to expel waste. You will still need to monitor the tank though

easiest setup for your task, but with only 3% it will take ages, burns plenty of energy to keep the filtration running and (most importatnt) as it takes that long and youve no automated overpressure failsave you blow up without knowing, simply because youve completely forgot about it.
smelt water ice in a small room and suck it through the filtration should give you good yields of N2 (20%) and water if you run it through a second filtration.
Kevin Jan 8, 2020 @ 12:58pm 
@Trash Templar, you are correct, all of those things will be needed for advanced set up, but OP described using active vents on the input and waste of atmo and output into a tank. In that situation only passive vents are needed.

Use whatever you like for propellent. I'd use co2 on Mars, why not.
< >
Showing 1-11 of 11 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Dec 31, 2019 @ 2:49am
Posts: 11