Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you ever want to put batteries in front to draw from your other batteries just make sure to use a transformer (good for separating a critical power system and making sure that will always have power over your "main" battery bank - i used this for making sure my airlocks will always be the last things to lose power if the sun never rises.)
Hope that helps a little.
I guess I’m confused still on the large size transformer uses
This is my 6 battery setup at the entrance, on the right is a large transformer so if i use the solid generator it won't overload the cables in front leading to batteries and solar panels.
then out of my batteries i put them directly to small transformers to power the things in my base.
i recommend always using small transformers for the normal cables especially when using APC's because Nuclear batteries can draw 3MW of power when charging (small/large batteries have a much lower power draw i believe)
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1296087497
Don’t get me wrong excellent idea I’m just wondering if in the game if you are loosing anything then in terms of KWH per unit of coal “burned”?
And yea the transformers do take some power (still very small compared to what the Solid gen outputs) but only when it is limiting the power passing through it i think (correct me if im wrong community?)
The only reason to use them is to stop cables from burning out so only use them where needed, but when they are needed i think there pretty efficient.
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1296282843
i have 2 gens being added either end of my base (i like symmetry) all feeding back into that line along with 20 solars hence the large transformer for each gen as the power potential for the battery line is around 50kw total.
Then, batteries in front of a batteries do need a transformer of some kind. This is how i create redundant electrical systems.
batteries1 > large transformers > batteries2 > small transformer > stuff2
batteries1 > small transfomer > stuff1
stuff2 will allways be the last things to lose power.
I have this grand idea of eventually staggering each system so if power ever did stop coming in first the lights and furnaces stop, then lathes and fabs stop, then atmos systems and lastly airlocks.
You could however just do it using logic circuits and probably be easier.
edit: i forgot heavy cables are 100kw now so rarely a need for large transformer before batteries
Each to their own I suppose. Seems unnecessarily complex for no real advantage that I can see. Keeps us all busy though I suppose :)
power generator(solar etc..) -> big battery array -> big transformer >little transformers > Multi apc's > Consumers
Like a tree.
This way you set the big transformer to the total of the little ones then the little ones each draw no more than 5kw and you can fine tune them.
I think the apc's have some regulation.
could be wrong, but i dont blow out wires or cause fires.
This is how I've done it except without the large transformer. It's really not necessary.