SPOILERS-What Angry Joe FAILED to Mention/show in his "review"

[Genius Destroyer]

if you already know AJ did his "review" of the game and gave it a 2/10

however if you pay attention to the review..all game focus and progress/information ENDS after the campfire with Pot skit..you see nothing mentioned about what happens next

the next footage is Delriths online play then some AI complaining..then the Save slot stuff..and THEN the final score...end of video finishes with out takes

notice ALSO the only Nanomachines of the future (Zombies) you see are the Wanderers

so...let's list all he missed out..sorry DIDNT BOTHER to get to in the game

the new wanderers

Boomers-Hunters (or stalkers) -Mortars never mentioned

the crafting of new weapons like sledgehammers-machetes-battle axes-Molotov's-Machine guns Shotguns-placed turrets-improved bows and arrows etc -Never mentioned

Seth- Never mentioned

the ability to develop food and water at your camp= never mentioned

the walker gears you can use and mow down zombies- never mentioned (HECK we see Delrith use one)

the "braindead AI" improving and becoming stronger and tougher to kill (aka hunters)-Never mentioned

Sahalanthropus- never mentioned

the hidden bosses Big Mouth and Frostbite- Never mentioned

the ability to make your self even more powerful post game- never mentioned

the twist at the end with Goodluck- never mentioned

the 15-minute survival mission - Never mentioned

the Endgame final mission with armies of Futuristic Nanomachines -Never mentioned

the characters you meet/save-Never mentioned (bar Reeve)

THE ENTIRETY OF THE SECOND MAP!!!

anyone else wanna add on what else he missed in his "review"

another interesting thread - http://steamcommunity.com/app/543900/discussions/0/1696040635905118958/

[Monarch]

Ki11s0n3 a écrit :

That's cause he never even finished the tutorial. I saw his stream of him playing it. He quit after the first mission and then started complaining about the game and the character slots. Which if he would of actually played the game he would know that the slots and microtransactions are pretty much there for show they aren't forced in you and aren't needed in any way. Angry Joe is a hack who just jumps on what ever is popular at the time.

Most famous reviewers real full time job is exactly that, reviewers.

To net the most revenue, ofcourse they will jump on what's most popular at the time.
And to not lose their revenue, is to not go against the most popular opinion at the time. Not doing so, would be like commiting suicide for their channels.

[LemonyNebula]

Yeah as I said before, he only played the first 4 hours. I mean that Seth thing was a huge giveaway as he is litterally on screen but he decides to joke about the box.

The ONLY info he has on the end is that you don't escape which anyone could mention as a passing statement. He gave no actual details of anything.

This was an exact copy of his impressions/playthorugh repeated as a review. Same points and everything. Lazy and calls to question other reviews. If he can review this game without playing it, how many others are there?

[Raiden]

Guys why do you even care anymore. Let the haters, hate. If you like the game, you like it. But making counter threads is like throwing poo at each other. As annoying as it may be, it's their right, I guess. Stay positive people.

Edit: I just contradicted myself man, it's also your right to do so. ♥♥♥♥ me man.

Edit2: ♥♥♥♥ now I cared, too much to uncare at this moment.

[Dr. Atrocious]

LemonyNebula a écrit :

Yeah as I said before, he only played the first 4 hours. I mean that Seth thing was a huge giveaway as he is litterally on screen but he decides to joke about the box.

The ONLY info he has on the end is that you don't escape which anyone could mention as a passing statement. He gave no actual details of anything.

This was an exact copy of his impressions/playthorugh repeated as a review. Same points and everything. Lazy and calls to question other reviews. If he can review this game without playing it, how many others are there?

Find the reviews with self-advertisement at the very start. Those are it.

That review is a sh*tpost. Disrespect to the players and Konami. Because no one else gives a damn about you.

[Genius Destroyer]

Raiden a écrit :

Guys why do you even care anymore. Let the haters, hate. If you like the game, you like it. But making counter threads is like throwing poo at each other. As annoying as it may be, it's their right, I guess. Stay positive people.

its a case that its WASNT a review or a "fair" review it was rushed lacking/had false information and was made to cash-in on the hate

NOW if he played hte game (and showed he did) and THEN with good reasons and explination gave the game 2/10 i'd be fine

[LemonyNebula]

Raiden a écrit :

Guys why do you even care anymore. Let the haters, hate. If you like the game, you like it. But making counter threads is like throwing poo at each other. As annoying as it may be, it's their right, I guess. Stay positive people.

Not countering peoples views on the game or their opinions. Not even countering the review score, I just think its pretty bad a review for a popularly bad game gives a reviewer a free pass to unfairly judge it by not giving it the same time they would give any other game and still review it.
Had this been a loved game people would be outraged. People got in a fuss just seeing people who are bad at games reviewing them, let alone someone who didn't even play it.

[Raiden]

The Broken Overlaa(ERROR) a écrit :

Raiden a écrit :

Guys why do you even care anymore. Let the haters, hate. If you like the game, you like it. But making counter threads is like throwing poo at each other. As annoying as it may be, it's their right, I guess. Stay positive people.

its a case that its WASNT a review or a "fair" review it was rushed lacking/had false information and was made to cash-in on the hate

NOW if he played hte game (and showed he did) and THEN with good reasons and explination gave the game 2/10 i'd be fine

You are totally right man. I watched it and while I have to admit that it was not a good review, his shenanigans were pretty funny (especially that cuban dance part).

[Dr. Atrocious]

LemonyNebula a écrit :

Raiden a écrit :

Guys why do you even care anymore. Let the haters, hate. If you like the game, you like it. But making counter threads is like throwing poo at each other. As annoying as it may be, it's their right, I guess. Stay positive people.

Not countering peoples views on the game or their opinions. Not even countering the review score, I just think its pretty bad a review for a popularly bad game gives a reviewer a free pass to unfairly judge it by not giving it the same time they would give any other game and still review it.
Had this been a loved game people would be outraged. People got in a fuss just seeing people who are bad at games reviewing them, let alone someone who didn't even play it.

Not worth caring about.

[Raiden]

LemonyNebula a écrit :

Raiden a écrit :

Guys why do you even care anymore. Let the haters, hate. If you like the game, you like it. But making counter threads is like throwing poo at each other. As annoying as it may be, it's their right, I guess. Stay positive people.

Not countering peoples views on the game or their opinions. Not even countering the review score, I just think its pretty bad a review for a popularly bad game gives a reviewer a free pass to unfairly judge it by not giving it the same time they would give any other game and still review it.
Had this been a loved game people would be outraged. People got in a fuss just seeing people who are bad at games reviewing them, let alone someone who didn't even play it.

Whatever the case may be, you guys are right that reviewers should be fair when they do their work. Doesn't matter how ♥♥♥♥ a game/movie/whatever is.

Edit: But doesn't counter hating it, bring more hate?

[LemonyNebula]

The Broken Overlaa(ERROR) a écrit :

Raiden a écrit :

Guys why do you even care anymore. Let the haters, hate. If you like the game, you like it. But making counter threads is like throwing poo at each other. As annoying as it may be, it's their right, I guess. Stay positive people.

its a case that its WASNT a review or a "fair" review it was rushed lacking/had false information and was made to cash-in on the hate

NOW if he played hte game (and showed he did) and THEN with good reasons and explination gave the game 2/10 i'd be fine

Exaclty. Imaging if he reviewed something like breath of the wild, but only played the first couple of hours and it shown in the review.

People would not be so forgiving

[LemonyNebula]

Raiden a écrit :

Whatever the case may be, you guys are right that reviewers should be fair when they do their work. Doesn't matter how ♥♥♥♥ a game/movie/whatever is.

Edit: But doesn't counter hating it, bring more hate?

But we are not countering hate, we are pointing out a lack of integrity in a review thats supposed to inform. The points he knew about where valid for the amount he played but not neccersarily the whole game.

[LemonyNebula]

ℛaveÐƵ a écrit :

Not worth caring about.

Not really, but I'm an idiot who this sort of thing bugs. Misinformation and all that.

[Raiden]

LemonyNebula a écrit :

Raiden a écrit :

Whatever the case may be, you guys are right that reviewers should be fair when they do their work. Doesn't matter how ♥♥♥♥ a game/movie/whatever is.

Edit: But doesn't counter hating it, bring more hate?

But we are not countering hate, we are pointing out a lack of integrity in a review thats supposed to inform. The points he knew about where valid for the amount he played but not neccersarily the whole game.

Yeah that's actually true. I'm just tired of all the negativity. It's the first time I've been so active in the forums and everybody is fighting. I guess I overreacted, but it's nice to have a good conversation with you people.

[Genius Destroyer]

Raiden a écrit :

LemonyNebula a écrit :

Not countering peoples views on the game or their opinions. Not even countering the review score, I just think its pretty bad a review for a popularly bad game gives a reviewer a free pass to unfairly judge it by not giving it the same time they would give any other game and still review it.
Had this been a loved game people would be outraged. People got in a fuss just seeing people who are bad at games reviewing them, let alone someone who didn't even play it.

Whatever the case may be, you guys are right that reviewers should be fair when they do their work. Doesn't matter how ♥♥♥♥ a game/movie/whatever is.

Edit: But doesn't counter hating it, bring more hate?

this isnt a a hate thread this is a thread pointing out how flawed the review was by listing a LOT that AJ's review of the game was missing...and pointing out how "odd" it was that in he review he SOMEHOW never thought it might be important to talk about them

[Raiden]

The Broken Overlaa(ERROR) a écrit :

Raiden a écrit :

Whatever the case may be, you guys are right that reviewers should be fair when they do their work. Doesn't matter how ♥♥♥♥ a game/movie/whatever is.

Edit: But doesn't counter hating it, bring more hate?

this isnt a a hate thread this is a thread pointing out how flawed the review was by listing a LOT that AJ's review of the game was missing...and pointing out how "odd" it was that in he review he SOMEHOW never thought it might be important to talk about them

You're right, sorry I overreacted.