Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Sinking civilian shipping (even if of a hostile nation) or oil rigs can result in court martial in a campaign.
I sunk a merchant ship in a mission and did not get credit for its tonnage. I assume it was of the type I was not supposed to sink, but how can I tell?
Oops! Anytime I find merchant ships, I sink them. They are always green. So, basically, most merchant ships you see should not be sunk?
In the mission you refer to, they both show up green, but they sail in a convoy (if you can call two ships in a coloumn a convoy), and they are escortet by a submarine. In this mission, VID is needed to identify the target correctly, as only one of the ships carry war material. You can VID from external view after 95 % sollution is acchieved, if sneaking in close to do it through the periscope does not suit you / or is to boring.
The target can be one of two ships... A RO-RO with visible APC's, tanks and trucks on deck, or a ship hauling containers clad in green tarp. One of the two ships carry multi colured containers, and should not be targeted.
My rule of thumb otherwise in game is: only sink merchants if they fly the Chineese flag in tandem with visible war material on deck, or visible containers covered in green tarp on deck.
But that's just me.
- Dolphin 48
Ok that makes sense thanks for clarifying
Anyway this is just a game and the fact I work on oil tankers makes my statement a bit ironic I guess.