Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Get a faster 4000 card and you might have a better chance.
More realistically expect 5000 series to truly start doing better
I hope they spend their next vacation on lawsuit island! *jk*
Its unfortunate for you but its not the way the devs implemented RTX its just a bit more than your card can handle in this game. This is not new and PC games have always had titles that push the hardware available at the time to its limits. e.g Quake 1 with its requirement for a maths co-processor (which a lot of Pc's did not have at the time) and OpenGL or Crisis. A game which destroyed most PC at the time.
as possible. First 30 min - 60 min is very playable and then fatal FPS dropping because GPU usage going 99% -> 50%-70%. Rubbish. Almost every single AAA title games released unfinished nowadays and disappointing gamers who have waited game itself very long time. It should be illegal to release beta games on version 1.00.
Digital Foundry's analysis, maybe you will respect it a bit more, RT is the only reason the graphics of this game arnt laughed at.....