Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
If you read my original post, I clearly stated it was installed on an SSD.
Still having issues regardless.
Want a list?
ASUS ROG STRIX RTX 2060 OC 6GB
Ryzen 2700 Overclocked to 4.1GHz across all cores
Noctua NH-D15 cpu cooler
ASRock Taichi X470 mobo
32GB of G.Skill Trident Z ram
and the game is installed on a 1TB SSD stuffed inside a Thermaltake View 71 TG case.
Nothing "tight budget" about it.
Normally I can play games at high-max settings at 100+fps in 1080P, I don't play in 4k (I don't own a 4k monitor)
I play Dying Light 2 at medium-high settings, at around 90-120 fps, but the amount of stuttering and lag that occurs legitimately hurts my eyes, and I can play a ton of VR without eye-strain, not to mention the incredible amount of flickering across textures I get after running the game for like 30mins to an hour.
These issues literally only occur with this game, no others in my library.
So, it seems very clear to me, that the game has piss-poor optimization currently.
Are display drivers up to date? Latest Windows version? Chipset drivers up to date etc?
I'm playing at 1440p but up-scaling to 4k then using FSR 2.0 performance with no ray tracing and ambient occlusion off, all other settings maxed out, the game looks and runs amazing for me and mine isn't even installed on my M.2 drive, its installed on a HDD, my game stutters for about 5-7 seconds after the map loads in but i think its just the textures loading, after that its buttery smooth.
RX 6750 XT Red Devil, Ryzen 5 5600X & 16GB DDR4 3600MHz.
CPU - $150
GPU - $250
Cooler - $100
Mobo - $150
RAM - $125
SSD - $100
Case - $200
Just over $1000 and that’s not even utilizing sales or good shopping habits…
It doesn’t scream optimization issue…
It's still not a tight budget rig.
A budget rig is like a $500 rig with a 2-4GB vid card and a quad core.
My rig handles every other game better, Dying Light 2 is the only game giving me issues, *even when I run it at lower settings, if you've been paying any attention*
I run VR games at high settings with no issues.
I simply think you have no idea what you're talking about.
Not meant as an insult, just stating an observation based on your remarks and the data given to me.
Dying Light 2 isn't more advanced than any other modern game on the market right now, the min specs are a 4GB vid card, a 4-core cpu and 8GB of ram.
For comparison, I run Half-Life Alyx at full settings in VR with 90fps and smooth video and the min specs for that game are a 6GB video card, a 6-core cpu, and 12GB of ram.
So, Dying Light 2 has poor optimization by direct comparison.
Make sense yet?
Counter-intuitively I had to *raise* my settings up to high across the board except fog quality, and use DLSS Ultra Quality at 50 sharpness and I've nullified most of the flickering and lag stutters. Still a few occaisionally here and there, but far less than I was experiencing.
Now I run at a relatively stable 90+fps.
I had so much trouble because I kept lowering my settings to get better performance (the typical response to poor-performance in a game), which seemed to hinder the performance instead of make it better (No clue what is going on there beyond poor low-end optimization).
Nice attitude. Good luck.
At 1080p lowering settings just puts more work onto the CPU and less onto the GPU, by putting your settings higher you are forcing the GPU to start taking on the workload.
Ill bet if you checked your utilisation before the CPU would have been 100% while the GPU at like 50% utilisation.
Nothing to do with the game optimisation, it because people like yourself don't know how to best get the most from your system.(no disrespect)
RTX optimization is much better after the latest "community update"/patch. I can almost run RT on my system w/DLSS balanced but I still can't quite get that nice average 60 FPS so it doesn't feel "smooth" enough to me so I run with the RT off.
Currently running a 2080ti, 3800x, 32gb DDR4 3600, plain old SATA SSD for games at 3440x1440 and with RT OFF all other settings maxed, DLSS on quality, DX12 I average ~90FPS.
Like A TIN OF JAR said, that's a very plausible explanation.
You're PC by today's standards is kinda "budget" like the other person said.
~3 years ago, certainly not. Today, yeah kinda is.
All that being said, still a fine rig for 1080p gaming for sure.
Those CAD hardware prices def hurt. About ~2.5 years ago I helped my Canadian friend pick out all the parts for his PC and he has very similar specs to yours except Ryzen 2600 CPU and an AIO cooler for it. His budget was ~$1500 for everything(totally new build, case fans, PSU etc..) and I think we had to stretch to ~$1600 to squeeze in the 2060.
Spent a lot of time hunting around for the best prices on everything to get into that ~$!600 CAD region too.
Glad you got it running well on your system, have fun!
What do you normally do when your system can't run a game well?
You lower the graphic settings to get better performance.
So me lowering the graphics should give me better performance, not worse.
Lowering graphics does not just dump the load to the cpu, no clue where you get that information from.