Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
peacekeepers are always nice to you, and are willing to negotiate, survivors legit try to hang you the minute they meet you and never do anything to make for it. etc
I still went survivors but in my opinion I felt like the game was begging me to side with the PKs
Maybe in the original planned version the PK would have committed more atrocities but in the current final version nothing much left besides the numerous betrayals of the survivors.
Let's look at Carl he claims they are peaceful and have done away with currency, meanwhile most of them are bloodthirsty thugs and anarchists, and they are openly trading for currency inside the Bazaar itself. Sophie is a bloodthirsty idiot obsessed with claiming power and Barney is a drunken thug and coward that casually uses his own people as human shields. They can't even defend their own territory let alone build a new civilisation. Literally an in game Chaz and just as retarded.
I would side with Survivor if Frank story happen first (his side is more of a middle ground of both faction in my opinion), but ♥♥♥♥ no Sophie and Barney can go kill themselves