Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
i really liked episode 1 when things was simple and interesting but got worse with each episode
the only good thing about this game was max+chloe picture grown up,
i havent played True colors but i have feeling it will suck same as this the protagonist is also very ugly masculine compared to feminine max or rachel.
developers should stop pushing for this lgbt CRAP, i only liked it in the first game even then u have the option for max to be with warren or reject chloe
Also there's not much narrative driven games with LGBTQ+ content, so I'm happy that Dontnod [and others] provides such opportunity to be connected to the characters we understand and not to be alienated by the predominant straight world. As Esteban would say to all white priveleged men: "So what? You've been spoiled for many years! Get used to share the space with LGBTQ+ community!".
Life is Strange True Colors is a different style of game (I would argue that it's commentary on the real world is the most subtle out of the whole series if anything, even more so in comparison to Life is Strange 1, excluding the DLC anyways). Life is Strange 2's commentary is mainly revolved around racial issues. Life is Strange 1 was mainly revolved around environmental issues. Life is Strange Before The Storm was mainly about social issues (in terms of social health). Life is Strange True Colors mainly revolves around historical revisionism. All of these games give the player romance options.
Not everyone that doesn't like Life is Strange 2, or that likes Life is Strange 2 but not as much as other games within the series, thinks in the same way.
Life is Strange True Colors is my second favorite game out of the whole series, yet it doesn't have Max, and depending on your choice in terms of your playthrough, it may or may not have Chloe either and if anything the connections to Life is Strange 1 and other games within the DLC was actually one of its flaws in my perspective, and Tell Me Why is very much focused on mainly LGBTQ+ issues and it is also my third favorite game in the series (some people say it isn't part of the series, some do, but whatever it's a good game and I recommend it) and that game only really had flaws with its gameplay and very scripted powers.
When he starts his let's play, he says that he really liked Life is Strange 1, but didn't really like Before The Storm, hence why he was going into this game not really feeling all that excited, so immediately it doesn't have to do with "but Chloe and Max." He also mentions that he is however hopeful that he will be pleasantly surprised. He does say later that this was mainly due to the lack of good use of powers within Before The Storm in comparison to Life is Strange 1.
Jack had also looked at extra stuff (don't know where the comment went that claimed the opposite) so it's not like he is just ignoring tons of the game.
I have always criticized the "karma system" that Life is Strange 2 has simply because it isn't really clear to the player, ever. Never explained, never hinted at, only a secret way of figuring that out that got patched out of the game for whatever reason, a choice in episode 3 that goes into the beginning of episode 4 and episode 5, depending on the color of Sean's replacement eye, determines whether you are able to cross the border or not, which again was very much not obvious, and it isn't even in the game anymore, as now its just covered for the whole game by the eye patch for whatever reason along with the fact that this is actually shown in Jack's let's play because it is an older early build of the game, whether Daniel listens to Sean or not, which is based in a scale by all of the choices oriented around Daniel, which then REVERSES the result by letting him do whatever he wants, basically you have to do the opposite of what you think would lead to Daniel to listen to you, in order to determine whether one of the characters dies or not depending on whether Daniel agrees with Sean's plan either way or not. None of this is explained within the game. It took me like three playthroughs in order to even finally understand how that worked.
He stopped playing the entire series. He could of played the other games and "made more views and money" but didn't, which mean't that he didn't really care about that aspect, nor would I think he would care in the first place given Jacksepticeye's popularity.
He mentions something interesting at the end of the first episode "When it was called Life is Strange 2 I WAS EXPECTING CHLOE AND MAX like when it had subtitles like Before The Storm and Captain Spirit I understood that it wasn't a part of the main storyline even though it ended up being a part of the main story."
He also mentions that "it feels rushed because we are going from one location to another" at the end of episode 2, which was a common complaint upon players including myself. He also mentions that the episodes aren't flowing as well along with the development and involvement from other characters because of the traveling aspect at the end of episode 3 and how it was too quick. This starts to get brought up multiple times by Jack in later parts of the let's play, as well as the uses of the powers and how it's linear and just causes problems or just for the sake of advancing the plot, which was another common complaint.
At the end of episode 3, Jack starts to wonder if his choices with Daniel cause Daniel to listen more to Sean versus not, so he has somewhat of an idea by about the middle of the game, but like I have repeatedly said, this isn't clear to players in general and needs to be way more clear.
Jacksepticeye is also kind of a comedian, so I don't see how that is a bad thing for him to make jokes. That is sort of what he does with everything.
Jack's comment on the game in terms of other stuff: "I feel like they wanted to go into all of these political issues and power to you if you want to tackle these issues, go for it, etc..., and I am not going to pretend to base an opinion on that, and it's bad, but it's only bringing up the issues and calling these issues bad, like a toddler bringing their toys on the table and being like "here you go" instead of showing more, etc..., and I hate that and I am not denying that at all, but what I am saying is to push harder and to show more about it and to show and educate people more because it feels like whatever happens in this game is stuff that I already know, etc..., and I don't know anything about it, and I want to know more about it, and I think that the game needs to try more, etc... then the traveling aspect hurt this aspect of the game, and yeah what happens is bad, but simply showing people and going it's bad isn't really responsible, and I'm not a writer, but there really needs to be more depth compared to what is actually shown and explained, if anything its putting the light on this stuff and then immediately taking that away..." He then talks about some inaccuracy stuff.
I don't think his let's play is bad, or the way that you are describing it, as being "arrogant about assumptions" as he literally says that he isn't the one with all the answers or that his words should be taken as such at the end of the series, or that he is doing anything for the sake of views or money, which he isn't, or that he had some unfair bias before starting the game, which he might have had a bias but it wasn't outside of a natural bias or anything, or that he had anything to do with other youtubers when it came to this game, which hasn't even been proven at all.
I think the reason people keep talking about this is because it seems like a lot of people think that either you have to absolutely love this game or absolutely hate it, and that each side views the other side as being overly unfair and wrong, when this isn't accurate.
i dont care about whatever issues, making a woke+political game= trash
on top of being trash the characters are boring AF, except david cuz he was in a better game