Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Otherwise, Power generators are probably the best thing to overclock, Linear increase in production, same footprint, no loss.
In your case... just moving from 8 generators to 4, it should be the same amount of water as well. 180 for each pair, 360 total. So as long as its looped in the same system as the 8 generator loop, it will (probably) be fine.
It becomes more of a thing with fuel gens and nuclear reactors imo. Like i got a power plant with 360 fuel generators, clocked to 240%, if they weren't overclocked i would need over 860 of them.
Overclcoking to me is more preferable when you can cut down a lot on machines, specially the larger ones like manufacturers.
So why build 20 power buildings when you can max overclock and condense that down to 8 of them instead.
- To save space
- to save repetitive, tedious work
- to not disfigure nature and landscape
- to save materials
you run all generators at 250%