Satisfactory on Win ARM64

[jejeswiss]

Hi all

Is there a way to run Satisfactory on Winows 11 ARM64 (Surface Pro 11, Qualcom X). Game just crashes during startup.

Regards JejeSwiss

[Side]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Wolfgang:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Side:

Have there been any updates on Coffee Stain Studios' end? ARM64 is not going to go away - quite the opposite. The Snapdragon Oryon and Apple M4 are insanely capable cores, so more and more enthusiasts will make the switch from any x86-64 based crap.

Look at the minimum specs. If you are below it, it is a no. No matter if ARM or not.

What kind of useless response is this? It is the same response you already gave twice in this thread - with no one gaining any value from it... 🤡

[Mojo]

Not to be "that guy" but surface pro is just a "suped up" tablet. You are not going to be able to run something like Satisfactory on it, even on the lowest of settings.

[Ryzilynt]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von jejeswiss:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Wolfgang:

That device is not for gaming and certainly not for this game. You are below minimum specs and you, most importantly, lack any kind of dedicated GPU.

So I'll try steam link over VPN and run the game on the desktop PC

That should work fine.

[Wolfgang]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Side:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Wolfgang:

Look at the minimum specs. If you are below it, it is a no. No matter if ARM or not.

What kind of useless response is this? It is the same response you already gave twice in this thread - with no one gaining any value from it... 🤡

You are clearly lacking reading comprehension. It was an answer to the question that I quoted.

The one before was to a specific device someone asked about. Anyone with first grade reading comprehension can understand that.
Now instead of spending your time here how about you instead listen to your teacher? You need it.

[Side]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Mojo:

Not to be "that guy" but surface pro is just a "suped up" tablet. You are not going to be able to run something like Satisfactory on it, even on the lowest of settings.

OP's machine comes with either the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus or Elite. Their specifications are as follows:
- The X1P-64-100 has 10 Oryon cores with a clock speed of 3,4 GHz. It achieves a PassMark score of 21 876.
- The X1E-80-100 has 2 additional cores and may be boosted to 4,0 GHz. It attains a slightly higher score of 23 541.
The official minimum requirement mentions the Intel i5-3570K, which, at the time of writing this reply, is a 13 year old CPU. It manages a whopping score of 4 960 - which is significantly less. While their recommended CPU is the significantly newer Intel i5-12400, which was released 3 years ago, it too fails to outperform OP's system with a score of 19 321.

Sure, their system is a tablet form factor, instead of the desktop most gamers are used to. But don't let this fool you into thinking this System-on-a-Chip isn't capable of significant performance. It certainly remains no match for a machine equipped with an Intel Core Ultra 9 CPU, but it sure beats any 5 year old gaming rig most people are playing Satisfactory on.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Wolfgang:

You are clearly lacking reading comprehension. It was an answer to the question that I quoted.

The one before was to a specific device someone asked about. Anyone with first grade reading comprehension can understand that.
Now instead of spending your time here how about you instead listen to your teacher? You need it.

You definitely have a point here. Both my reading comprehension, writing, and language skills in general are absolute ♥♥♥♥! It took me over 2 weeks to put together this response! Any advice where someone like me might find a teacher? I don't understand a word they are saying in class - they all speak German and I never learned that language 🥲

[Wolfgang]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Side:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Mojo:

Not to be "that guy" but surface pro is just a "suped up" tablet. You are not going to be able to run something like Satisfactory on it, even on the lowest of settings.

OP's machine comes with either the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus or Elite. Their specifications are as follows:
- The X1P-64-100 has 10 Oryon cores with a clock speed of 3,4 GHz. It achieves a PassMark score of 21 876.
- The X1E-80-100 has 2 additional cores and may be boosted to 4,0 GHz. It attains a slightly higher score of 23 541.
The official minimum requirement mentions the Intel i5-3570K, which, at the time of writing this reply, is a 13 year old CPU. It manages a whopping score of 4 960 - which is significantly less. While their recommended CPU is the significantly newer Intel i5-12400, which was released 3 years ago, it too fails to outperform OP's system with a score of 19 321.

Sure, their system is a tablet form factor, instead of the desktop most gamers are used to. But don't let this fool you into thinking this System-on-a-Chip isn't capable of significant performance. It certainly remains no match for a machine equipped with an Intel Core Ultra 9 CPU, but it sure beats any 5 year old gaming rig most people are playing Satisfactory on.

That's great but the CPU isn't the only thing needed for this game. It also needs a dedicated GPU and that is where the answer is a big "NO" for that device for running this game.

[Ryzilynt]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Wolfgang:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Side:

OP's machine comes with either the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus or Elite. Their specifications are as follows:
- The X1P-64-100 has 10 Oryon cores with a clock speed of 3,4 GHz. It achieves a PassMark score of 21 876.
- The X1E-80-100 has 2 additional cores and may be boosted to 4,0 GHz. It attains a slightly higher score of 23 541.
The official minimum requirement mentions the Intel i5-3570K, which, at the time of writing this reply, is a 13 year old CPU. It manages a whopping score of 4 960 - which is significantly less. While their recommended CPU is the significantly newer Intel i5-12400, which was released 3 years ago, it too fails to outperform OP's system with a score of 19 321.

Sure, their system is a tablet form factor, instead of the desktop most gamers are used to. But don't let this fool you into thinking this System-on-a-Chip isn't capable of significant performance. It certainly remains no match for a machine equipped with an Intel Core Ultra 9 CPU, but it sure beats any 5 year old gaming rig most people are playing Satisfactory on.

That's great but the CPU isn't the only thing needed for this game. It also needs a dedicated GPU and that is where the answer is a big "NO" for that device for running this game.

I don't like the surface pro for anything. They have passive cooling. That's it , game over.

[ma11oc]

Did anyone ask the developers? Doesn't compilation target matter? I'm pretty sure compiling a binary for just x86 will just result in the binary crashing for an ARM system.

I use a Windows Surface Pro 11 for gaming. The Qualcomm Snapdragon is a wonderful chip line. OSRS runs fine, was able to play Raft...

Usually this happens when the devs only compile for a specific target. I may be mistaken.

[RadioIesbian Fluid]

Theres more to porting a program to arm than just recompile it.
You have a translation layer which translates x86 to arm instructions. So some programs might run to various degree. but far from all will.
Arm users currently arent many enough to do the effort of making it work. Maybe when theres more arm systems out there things change, but for now arm is mainly a gimmick and not adopted much at all.