Optimization Coming in 1.0!

[Munin]

Check out and discuss the most recent development video here.

Today we're talking Optimization coming in 1.0!

Tweaks to foliage collision for vehicles, new lightweight buildables system, and updated upscalers!

https://youtu.be/yIKjR5jVv9Y

➥ Watch the last video here.
➥ Read the last thread here.

[RelaxItsJustAGame]

Can we please get an Advanced option to not have to use power shards to do Overclocking?

There is a mod for it, but it'd be nice to have in vanilla settings. I like how there's one for not needing to search for hard drives to do alternate recipes (it simply unlocks them all immediately). Some of us enjoy the factory-building part of the game much more than the exploration/adventure game part of it, so this would be a nice addition. Thanks for reading.

[ｎｏｍａｄ]

Is there going to be a fix for zooping placement lag? I get like 90fps smooth, but if I zoop in 10 blocks i get insane lag spikes, FPS dumps down to 10fps, then recovers ~10-15 seconds later. Anything coming to fix this in 1.0? Kinda getting impatient waiting for these things to happen. I want a giant map-sized factory without the frames tanking every time i zoop a few blocks in. I have a "sky factory" where i have likely tens of thousands of blocks above the map (including the factory itself), last update made the game playable to an extent but I hope better optimization allows for this size factory even more...

[Zak]

Originally posted by ｎｏｍａｄ:

I want a giant map-sized factory without the frames tanking every time

That will probably never happen, keep your expectation reasonable :) There are always creative players who push a game to its limits, but most players don't.

[ｎｏｍａｄ]

Originally posted by Zak:

Originally posted by ｎｏｍａｄ:

I want a giant map-sized factory without the frames tanking every time

That will probably never happen, keep your expectation reasonable :) There are always creative players who push a game to its limits, but most players don't.

...who are you? was trying to make something out to devs, not sure why your input here is necessary if you're not part of their team, especially without context applied

[Zak]

Originally posted by ｎｏｍａｄ:

Originally posted by Zak:

That will probably never happen, keep your expectation reasonable :) There are always creative players who push a game to its limits, but most players don't.

...who are you? was trying to make something out to devs, not sure why your input here is necessary if you're not part of their team, especially without context applied

Ah, you are obviously unaware that this is a public forum? So anyone is free to comment. If that bothers you then don't post here.

[ｎｏｍａｄ]

Originally posted by Zak:

Originally posted by ｎｏｍａｄ:

...who are you? was trying to make something out to devs, not sure why your input here is necessary if you're not part of their team, especially without context applied

Ah, you are obviously unaware that this is a public forum? So anyone is free to comment. If that bothers you then don't post here.

Obvious red herring aside, I think it's pretty clear where my comments are directed, and judging from the rest of this thread you seem to think your constant input is needed (it isn't).

It's your purview that players should be discouraged from making large factories as well, which is entirely antithetical to the concept of the game as well as the game engine it runs on. I don't understand how that's managing any expectations, and if we used least common denominator like you seem to gravitate towards, the world would be a much worse place.

Quite frankly, I think you should keep your opinions (of which you seem to have too many here) to yourself. You seem like a loudmouth intent on starting an unnecessary forum flame war which isn't constructive to the reason I've posted, which is overtly for the developers of this game which does not include you. Nothing was directed towards you until you felt the incessant need to interject yourself into my context-provided criticism to people that are making this game (which you didn't even seem to read for some reason). Feel free to socialize outside in the real world, because I don't care who you are or what your input is if you're not a literal developer of Satisfactory.

[Wolfgang]

If you want to reach out to the devs their QA site is a much better way to do that.

[Sawboss]

Originally posted by ｎｏｍａｄ:

Obvious red herring aside, I think it's pretty clear where my comments are directed, and judging from the rest of this thread you seem to think your constant input is needed (it isn't).

It's your purview that players should be discouraged from making large factories as well, which is entirely antithetical to the concept of the game as well as the game engine it runs on. I don't understand how that's managing any expectations, and if we used least common denominator like you seem to gravitate towards, the world would be a much worse place.

Quite frankly, I think you should keep your opinions (of which you seem to have too many here) to yourself. You seem like a loudmouth intent on starting an unnecessary forum flame war which isn't constructive to the reason I've posted, which is overtly for the developers of this game which does not include you. Nothing was directed towards you until you felt the incessant need to interject yourself into my context-provided criticism to people that are making this game (which you didn't even seem to read for some reason). Feel free to socialize outside in the real world, because I don't care who you are or what your input is if you're not a literal developer of Satisfactory.

This is such a mental post. That's my opinion, is it too many? That person gave two, which prompted unnecessary sarcasm and baseless judgement of their character.

Anyway, your criticism was just "Make the game run perfectly regardless of what is happening in it at all times." Unrealistic expectations for a game of this kind where players can literally build anywhere without limits, you will eventually hit a point that will slow down any computer.

[Wolfgang]

Originally posted by Sawboss:

Originally posted by ｎｏｍａｄ:

Obvious red herring aside, I think it's pretty clear where my comments are directed, and judging from the rest of this thread you seem to think your constant input is needed (it isn't).

It's your purview that players should be discouraged from making large factories as well, which is entirely antithetical to the concept of the game as well as the game engine it runs on. I don't understand how that's managing any expectations, and if we used least common denominator like you seem to gravitate towards, the world would be a much worse place.

Quite frankly, I think you should keep your opinions (of which you seem to have too many here) to yourself. You seem like a loudmouth intent on starting an unnecessary forum flame war which isn't constructive to the reason I've posted, which is overtly for the developers of this game which does not include you. Nothing was directed towards you until you felt the incessant need to interject yourself into my context-provided criticism to people that are making this game (which you didn't even seem to read for some reason). Feel free to socialize outside in the real world, because I don't care who you are or what your input is if you're not a literal developer of Satisfactory.

This is such a mental post. That's my opinion, is it too many? That person gave two, which prompted unnecessary sarcasm and baseless judgement of their character.

Anyway, your criticism was just "Make the game run perfectly regardless of what is happening in it at all times." Unrealistic expectations for a game of this kind where players can literally build anywhere without limits, you will eventually hit a point that will slow down any computer.

What? More to render and more stuff to calculate puts more stress and demand on your hardware? What kind of hoax is that?
We all know that if a game can not run at max settings and at least 1000FPS on a C64 it is absolutely unoptimised. /s

[human after all]

Originally posted by ｎｏｍａｄ:

Originally posted by Zak:

Ah, you are obviously unaware that this is a public forum? So anyone is free to comment. If that bothers you then don't post here.

Obvious red herring aside, I think it's pretty clear where my comments are directed, and judging from the rest of this thread you seem to think your constant input is needed (it isn't).

It's your purview that players should be discouraged from making large factories as well, which is entirely antithetical to the concept of the game as well as the game engine it runs on. I don't understand how that's managing any expectations, and if we used least common denominator like you seem to gravitate towards, the world would be a much worse place.

Quite frankly, I think you should keep your opinions (of which you seem to have too many here) to yourself. You seem like a loudmouth intent on starting an unnecessary forum flame war which isn't constructive to the reason I've posted, which is overtly for the developers of this game which does not include you. Nothing was directed towards you until you felt the incessant need to interject yourself into my context-provided criticism to people that are making this game (which you didn't even seem to read for some reason). Feel free to socialize outside in the real world, because I don't care who you are or what your input is if you're not a literal developer of Satisfactory.

lol

[NZ.Zero]

Originally posted by Munin:

Optimization Coming in 1.0

yey, I'll be able to load my 60 train world on steamdeck*


* in my dreams.