This game needs DLSS

[Jazz the Goose]

Not for performance reasons, but because the TAA is not good. It gets especially blurry during fast camera movement. DLSS would fix that.

[RAMChYLD]

Turn off motion blurring.

DLSS is unfair tho because its NVidia only, and even then only RTX cards. Rather have FSR which works for everyone.

[Jazz the Goose]

Originally posted by RAMChYLD:

Turn off motion blurring.

DLSS is unfair tho because its NVidia only, and even then only RTX cards. Rather have FSR which works for everyone.

fsr is worse than unreal 4's integrated temporal reconstruction. DLSS is hardware accelerated, and it is literally inteegrated into UE4 also

[Stamgast]

Originally posted by Jazz the Goose:

Originally posted by RAMChYLD:

Turn off motion blurring.

DLSS is unfair tho because its NVidia only, and even then only RTX cards. Rather have FSR which works for everyone.

fsr is worse than unreal 4's integrated temporal reconstruction. DLSS is hardware accelerated, and it is literally inteegrated into UE4 also

worse ore not the option it should be compatible for everybody not for some to make it feel better :D ow and just that it says hardware accelerated doesn't mean its not dependable of on or the other

[Munin]

DLSS, just like Raytracing, is not planned afaik.

[MrKlorox]

DLSS, is not like ray tracing in any way, other than it's hardware supported by RTX cards. Adding ray tracing requires an overhaul of the lighting system. DLSS requires very little and essentially upscales the output. Comparing DLSS to Ray Tracing is something who aren't familiar with either would do.

[GrandTickler]

nvidia experience gamefilters sharpen and sharpen+ is good enough

[SourHammer]

Originally posted by MrKlorox:

DLSS, is not like ray tracing in any way, other than it's hardware supported by RTX cards. Adding ray tracing requires an overhaul of the lighting system. DLSS requires very little and essentially upscales the output. Comparing DLSS to Ray Tracing is something who aren't familiar with either would do.

They didnt compare them, other than to say neither are planned.

[Koh]

Originally posted by MrKlorox:

DLSS, is not like ray tracing in any way, other than it's hardware supported by RTX cards. Adding ray tracing requires an overhaul of the lighting system. DLSS requires very little and essentially upscales the output. Comparing DLSS to Ray Tracing is something who aren't familiar with either would do.

They weren't comparing the two. lol

[Balsover]

This game is hardly graphic intensive. DLSS isn't going to help you.

[Die Hand Gottes]

Originally posted by RAMChYLD:

Turn off motion blurring.

DLSS is unfair tho because its NVidia only, and even then only RTX cards. Rather have FSR which works for everyone.

FSR is crap rather DLSS Which also really brings a performance boost and still looks good.

[Wolfgang]

I really want to know what people hope to achieve with DLSS or FSR (which are for your GPU) on a game that is capping out on the CPU first.

Seriously, putting in something to lower the stress on the GPU is doing nothing to the performance when the bottleneck is the CPU.

[Still B0r3d]

Originally posted by Wolfgang:

I really want to know what people hope to achieve with DLSS or FSR (which are for your GPU) on a game that is capping out on the CPU first.

Seriously, putting in something to lower the stress on the GPU is doing nothing to the performance when the bottleneck is the CPU.

DLSS 3 is actually good for games that are CPU-bound, this actually is demonstrated in the new Witcher 3 update pretty well, frame generation is the only way it is even playable on max settings with ray tracing.. I am not claiming it would be worth adding for the 6 people that have 4000's series cards that support it that want to build game breaking factories, totally not worth the effort.

[Razunter]

It's kind of dumb that the game doesn't have DLSS, it's Unreal Engine game...