Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And that is assuming victory is even possible... for the machine intelligence, it certainly seems like a logical fallacy, if they ever actually achieve victory, they can no longer achieve victory. Meaning the machine intelligence would likely never seek victory to begin with, it would just create endless infinite loops to evolve, but always leaving a backdoor (like Androids) to avoid achieving total victory.
For Androids, what ending E showed is literally the only way to ever break out of it, they need to transfer memories of all cycles and at some point, the flaw of a cycle will be revealed before the AI can utilize it.
TL;DR depressing are imo all endings. But I can't say I didn't enjoy the story, it was thought provoking and more complex than I thought.
But she was eating them so they could feel safe inside her :(