NieR:Automata™

NieR:Automata™

View Stats:
deimos Mar 19, 2017 @ 8:58am
Graphics sucks?
Seriously. I maxed out all settings possible and still here is the picture I see when playing:

http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=887037187


Are there some tricks to improve it, like mods or something?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 186 comments
For Real!? Mar 19, 2017 @ 9:05am 
Nope. The devs in this series are known for making games that look like they belong to something 3-4 years ago
deimos Mar 19, 2017 @ 9:07am 
This can't even be justified by saying "It's a console port".

It's some PS3 graphics level. Or even late PS2.
For Real!? Mar 19, 2017 @ 9:08am 
Original nier had ♥♥♥♥ visuals as well
FeilDOW Mar 19, 2017 @ 9:09am 
This game isn't really about graphical fidelity, it's about gameplay, and it has that in spades.
Null_User Mar 19, 2017 @ 9:09am 
I think the problem here is that the world is all loaded always or something. It's like the devs decided to break the rules of how open world and polygon limits should be designed in a way to show a lot of terrain without breaking the hardware it's running on. It's the only explanation I can have for having a game that looks like a PS3 era thing to give so many problems to both the PS4 (it's not a smooth ride there either, kids) and PC.
AD33L Mar 19, 2017 @ 9:10am 
Originally posted by vendrick lamar:
Nope. The devs in this series are known for making games that look like they belong to something 3-4 years ago

Scalebound (before it got cancelled) looked amazing and Next-gen level. But this game was supposedly made by the B-team of platinum games. Graphically it might not be up there with alot of recent games, but they got the gameplay on lockdown.
deimos Mar 19, 2017 @ 9:10am 
Not really. It has mediocore gameplay. It's about 2B's ass. 2B's ass in ♥♥♥♥♥♥ graphics.
Desu Vult Mar 19, 2017 @ 9:11am 
The graphics are definitely not the greatest, but they really aren't the focus of Nier. Go for FF if you want super visuals JRPG, but you sacrifice the gameplay and awesome story for it.
Last edited by Desu Vult; Mar 19, 2017 @ 9:11am
VongolaXth Mar 19, 2017 @ 9:13am 
Originally posted by deimos:
Not really. It has mediocore gameplay. It's about 2B's ass. 2B's ass in ♥♥♥♥♥♥ graphics.

It may not have the best graphics, if you don't like the game because it's not so good looking, stop playing it. Easy as that... If you like to know the story behind this game then go ahead and play it... Played more than 2 hours? No? Then refund it and stfu please.
deimos Mar 19, 2017 @ 9:15am 
Originally posted by VongolaXth:
Played more than 2 hours? No? Then refund it and stfu please.

i habe 7.8 hrs on record ~
BeastSlayer Mar 19, 2017 @ 9:17am 
The graphic sucks, but the action animation is amazing, personally I'd take good animation over good graphic.

Modded Skyrim has amazing graphic for screenshot, but when stuff moves it looks bad because modder cannot fix ♥♥♥♥♥♥ animations.
Chouchers Mar 19, 2017 @ 9:19am 
Originally posted by deimos:
Seriously. I maxed out all settings possible and still here is the picture I see when playing:

http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=887037187


Are there some tricks to improve it, like mods or something?
Looks as graphical fidelity as real world to me.
WhatTheFudge Mar 19, 2017 @ 9:36am 
Just disable all ingame post processing, and you use a Reshade preset.
-->
Better performance better graphics
[Fmds]Finder82 Mar 19, 2017 @ 9:39am 
Graphics are passable, but the game is far too demanding for producing these kind of ps3 graphics.
NuhUh Mar 19, 2017 @ 9:40am 
You people complain about EVERYTHING! You guys are never happy! It's sad, really ...
< >
Showing 1-15 of 186 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Mar 19, 2017 @ 8:58am
Posts: 217