Are they going to make a new Hunting game or is that it, just bits added now and then?

[Gremlin]

kinda want a fresh new game thats going to give alot of what this has but better

[Proximo]

No news about new game and dont even think about it if current company owns this game, just update once every few months that add poor reserves with bugs all over place. Not to mention that game never had bugfix update.

[ULTRA]

Yeah since someone else opened that can of worms, I can say with some certainty that you probably don't want to play a standalone sequel from these guys.

[hunterPRO1]

Originally posted by ULTRA:

Yeah since someone else opened that can of worms, I can say with some certainty that you probably don't want to play a standalone sequel from these guys.

.... This game IS the sequel man.

[James]

Originally posted by Proximo:

No news about new game and dont even think about it if current company owns this game, just update once every few months that add poor reserves with bugs all over place. Not to mention that game never had bugfix update.

That's a rather harsh statement.
Poor reserves? I find them reserves very good. I do not come across many bugs at all (perhaps my playstyle?). Just my 2 cents...

@Gremlin, what would you like to be better? That could be a good discussion.

[El Poto]

The problem most people proposing this don't see is that a new game wouldn't have "a lot but better". It most likely be "fewer but worst", just as it was seven years ago with this one compared to Classic.

This has been mentioned several times on live streams and there is no plan for a new game. Best I can remember, Jaxy's response has been that they want to support and bring more content to this game for years yet.

A new game might bring innovation, like this one compared to Classic with the graphics and persistent world. However, that was all the advantage there was to be had over its predecessor. But for the rest it would be going back to a very basic set. A few rifles, shotguns, pistols and bows (if we are lucky), one or two reserves, a handful of animals. Then again years and years to get close to what we have now. Some even question if the persistent world was a good idea at all.

Then it might be a huge fiasco. Because, even though, of all the studios out there, EW is likely the one with the best chance. So far they have 2 out of 3 regarding hunting games (we cannot overlook The Hunter: Primal), that is the risk we face when someone attempts something from scratch, like Way of the Hunter, or Hunting Simulator 2. Those two can't even hold a candle to Classic.

[ULTRA]

Originally posted by hunterPRO1:

Originally posted by ULTRA:

Yeah since someone else opened that can of worms, I can say with some certainty that you probably don't want to play a standalone sequel from these guys.

.... This game IS the sequel man.

And the Godfather Part 2 was the sequel, but I'm pretty sure you don't want Francis Ford Coppola making another one of those either

[Proximo]

Originally posted by James:

Originally posted by Proximo:

No news about new game and dont even think about it if current company owns this game, just update once every few months that add poor reserves with bugs all over place. Not to mention that game never had bugfix update.

That's a rather harsh statement.
Poor reserves? I find them reserves very good. I do not come across many bugs at all (perhaps my playstyle?). Just my 2 cents...

Many missions across every reserves are bugged and cant be finished, for example Medved Taiga missions are very buggy with mission tracks/objects being stuck in rocks which cant allow us to finish missions. Game landscaping is good yes but the textures and bugs that come with it are not so good... also bugged animals that sometimes do... yoga?!?! or die under textures falling out of the map, thats just a tip of an iceberg best proof I can give you is "bug" thread for this game where people complain about bugs not being fixed and where currently there are over 10k threads.

[Legiondorf]

I feel like COTW doesnt look as good anymore as a few years ago. Compared to lighting in ARK ASA its just not super realistic for 2024. Also the Australia map looks off agree fellow Aussies?... I think the gum trees are too small or something.

[Tommyangelo]

well the the hunter classic is the money maker and thats all the purchases, theres some in COTW but not nearly as much so the cash cow is still the the the hunter classic

[biotopegreen]

I was severely disappointed with the July COTW and WOTH updates.
So I have high hopes for Ultimate Hunting.

I came here to look at it because I got a notification from steam, but all I see is an advertisement for DLC, and no reports about fixing bugs that players are having trouble with.
Yet the makers are writing false comments in response to reviews from players saying they can't play due to bugs, as if they will quickly get rid of the bugs.

[FeatheryBacon]

Originally posted by Legiondorf:

I feel like COTW doesnt look as good anymore as a few years ago. Compared to lighting in ARK ASA its just not super realistic for 2024.

One of the stupidest things I've ever read.

"A 7 year old game made in Apex doesn't look as good as a <1 year old game being developed in Unreal Engine 5"
No ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ♥♥♥♥

[ULTRA]

Originally posted by FeatheryBacon:

Originally posted by Legiondorf:

I feel like COTW doesnt look as good anymore as a few years ago. Compared to lighting in ARK ASA its just not super realistic for 2024.

One of the stupidest things I've ever read.

"A 7 year old game made in Apex doesn't look as good as a <1 year old game being developed in Unreal Engine 5"
No ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ♥♥♥♥

Yeah, gee, it's almost as though they were implying that the game were worth updating with modern technology.

[TheMantisman]

I look forward to Ultimate Hunter